SPECIES SUBSTITUTION OF RETAIL SNAPPER FILLETS

被引：20

作者：

HSIEH, YHP

WOODWARD, BB

BLANCO, AW

机构：

[1] Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama

[2] Food and Residue Laboratories, Division of Food Safety, Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Tallahassee, Florida

[3] Biopath Inc, Palm Beach, Florida, 33401

来源：

JOURNAL OF FOOD QUALITY | 1995年 / 18卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1745-4557.1995.tb00368.x

中图分类号：

TS2 [食品工业];

学科分类号：

0832 ;

摘要：

A total of 121 retail marker snapper fillets were collected throughout Florida and tested for compliance with labeling regulations. Samples were identified as to species by isoelectric focusing techniques against 12 authentic snapper species. Of the 81 red snapper samples, 24 (30%) were confirmed as real red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus), while 57 (70%) were mislabeled. Most of the other snapper species were correctly labeled. The major substitute for red snapper was scarlet snapper (Lutjanus sanguineus), an imported red-skin pacific snapper species. Nomenclature of fish fold in the market is confusing since the same species of fish is frequently sold by several different names.

引用

页码：131 / 140

页数：10

共 14 条

[11]

LUNDSTROM R.C., RODERICK S.A., Fish‐species identification by thin‐layer isoelectric focusing of sarcoplasmic proteins, Sci. Tools, 26, pp. 38-43, (1979)

[12]

MARTIN R.E., DOYLE W., BROOKER J.R., Toward an improved seafood nomenclature system, Mar. Fish. Rev., 45, pp. 1-20, (1983)

[13]

UKISHIMA Y., KINO M., KUBOTA H., Identification of whale species by thin‐layer isoelectric focusing of sarcoplasmic proteins, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 74, pp. 943-950, (1991)

[14]

“The Fish List” FDA guide to acceptable market names for food fish sold in interstate commerce, (1988)

← 1 2 →