ASSESSMENT OF CORTICAL MOTOR OUTPUT - COMPOUND MUSCLE ACTION-POTENTIAL VERSUS TWITCH FORCE RECORDING

被引:30
作者
KIERS, L [1 ]
CLOUSTON, P [1 ]
CHIAPPA, KH [1 ]
CROS, D [1 ]
机构
[1] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL LABS, EMG LAB, BOSTON, MA 02114 USA
来源
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1995年 / 97卷 / 02期
关键词
TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIAL (MEP) AMPLITUDE; TWITCH FORCE;
D O I
10.1016/0924-980X(94)00325-2
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
To determine whether motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and area are accurate measurements of the magnitude of response to magnetic cortical stimulation, we simultaneously recorded the twitch and MEP in the first dorsal interosseous muscle of 8 normal subjects. Consecutive stimuli were delivered at increasing stimulus intensities (SI) or with increasing levels of background voluntary muscle contraction (BVC). There was stimulus to stimulus variability in MEP amplitude, area and twitch force. At low SI and at low levels of background contraction, there was a good correlation between twitch amplitude and MEP amplitude and area (r = 0.6-0.96, P < 0.005). Increasing either variable caused the correlation to decrease significantly (r = 0.02-0.31, P > 0.01). With increasing SI, MEP amplitude and area plateaued but twitch force continued to increase. A similar pattern was observed with higher levels of background muscle contraction although in some subjects a second increase in MEP amplitude and area was seen. Collision experiments demonstrated that the amplitude of the EMG activity resulting from repetitive motoneuron firing increased as SI was increased. This is due to multiple descending volleys which result in repetitive firing of some spinal motoneurons. Rapid, repetitive firing of some motor units is likely to result in phase cancellation and, therefore, the MEP amplitude, and to a lesser extent area, do not accurately reflect the net motor output.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 139
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   FOCAL STIMULATION OF HUMAN CEREBRAL-CORTEX WITH THE MAGNETIC COIL - A COMPARISON WITH ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
AMASSIAN, VE ;
CRACCO, RQ ;
MACCABEE, PJ .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 74 (06) :401-416
[2]   ANALYSIS OF MUSCLE RESPONSES ELICITED BY TRANSCRANIAL STIMULATION OF THE CORTICOSPINAL SYSTEM IN MAN [J].
BENECKE, R ;
MEYER, BU ;
GOHMANN, M ;
CONRAD, B .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 69 (05) :412-422
[3]   DESCENDING VOLLEY AFTER ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC TRANSCRANIAL STIMULATION IN MAN [J].
BERARDELLI, A ;
INGHILLERI, M ;
CRUCCU, G ;
MANFREDI, M .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1990, 112 (01) :54-58
[4]   A METHOD OF MONITORING FUNCTION IN CORTICOSPINAL PATHWAYS DURING SCOLIOSIS SURGERY WITH A NOTE ON MOTOR CONDUCTION VELOCITIES [J].
BOYD, SG ;
ROTHWELL, JC ;
COWAN, JMA ;
WEBB, PJ ;
MORLEY, T ;
ASSELMAN, P ;
MARSDEN, CD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1986, 49 (03) :251-257
[5]   TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX WITH MAGNETIC STIMULATION - FACTORS AFFECTING ACCURACY AND REPRODUCIBILITY [J].
BRASILNETO, JP ;
MCSHANE, LM ;
FUHR, P ;
HALLETT, M ;
COHEN, LG .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (01) :9-16
[6]   CORTICOSPINAL VOLLEYS EVOKED BY ANODAL AND CATHODAL STIMULATION OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX [J].
BURKE, D ;
HICKS, RG ;
STEPHEN, JPH .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1990, 425 :283-299
[7]   EFFECT OF ACTIVATION HISTORY ON TENSION PRODUCTION BY INDIVIDUAL MUSCLE UNITS [J].
BURKE, RE ;
RUDOMIN, P ;
ZAJAC, FE .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1976, 109 (03) :515-529
[8]   MAGNETIC STIMULATION - DETERMINATION OF COIL CURRENT FLOW DIRECTION [J].
CHIAPPA, KH ;
CROS, D ;
COHEN, D .
NEUROLOGY, 1991, 41 (07) :1154-1155
[9]  
CHIAPPA KH, 1991, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, P186
[10]   MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION IN INTACT MAN .2. MULTIPLE DESCENDING VOLLEYS [J].
DAY, BL ;
ROTHWELL, JC ;
THOMPSON, PD ;
DICK, JPR ;
COWAN, JMA ;
BERARDELLI, A ;
MARSDEN, CD .
BRAIN, 1987, 110 :1191-1209