DSS THEORY - A MODEL OF CONSTRUCTS AND RELATIONSHIPS

被引:52
作者
EIERMAN, MA
NIEDERMAN, F
ADAMS, C
机构
[1] UNIV BALTIMORE,DEPT IQS,BALTIMORE,MD 21201
[2] UNIV MINNESOTA,DEPT IDS,MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55455
关键词
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; GROUP DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; EXECUTIVE INFORMATION SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/0167-9236(94)00012-H
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A theoretical framework for DSS research is developed in terms of the key elements of theory: domain boundaries, constructs, and relationships among constructs. Eight broad DSS constructs (environment, task, implementation strategy, DSS capability, DSS configuration, user, user behaviour, and performance) are identified. Based on a review of the literature, 17 relationships among these constructs are examined. The most frequently studied relationships in the model are the influences of: (1) DSS capabilities on user behaviour; (2) user behaviour on performance; and (3) DSS capabilities on performance. Studies regarding these relationships use a wide variety of measures and present generally divergent results. Although studied less frequently, fairly consistent relationships were observed, suggesting: (1) the strategy used for DSS implementation influences both user behaviour and DSS performance; and (2) environmental factors such as top management support and user training influence DSS performance. Conclusions include: (1) there has been some progress toward understanding DSS based on the accumulation of research to date; (2) past research has examined less than half of the possible relationships among constructs, creating opportunities for new insights; and (3) divergent results on key pairs of constructs may result from interaction with other constructs, necessitating the simultaneous examination of fuller DSS research models to understand the contingencies influencing these relationships.(2)
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 26
页数:26
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   AN EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY FOR IMPLEMENTING A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM [J].
ALAVI, M ;
HENDERSON, JC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1981, 27 (11) :1309-1323
[2]   An Assessment of the Concept of Decision Support Systems as Viewed by Senior-Level Executives [J].
Alavi, Maryam .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1982, 6 (04) :1-9
[3]   DSS DESIGN - A SYSTEMIC VIEW OF DECISION SUPPORT [J].
ARIAV, G ;
GINZBERG, MJ .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1985, 28 (10) :1045-1052
[4]  
Baldwin D., 1986, Decision Support Systems, V2, P159, DOI 10.1016/0167-9236(86)90093-X
[5]  
Benbasat I., 1990, Decision Support Systems, V6, P203, DOI 10.1016/0167-9236(90)90015-J
[6]   AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF GRAPHICAL AND COLOR-ENHANCED INFORMATION PRESENTATION [J].
BENBASAT, I ;
DEXTER, AS .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (11) :1348-1364
[7]  
Bonczek R. H., 1979, Decision Sciences, V10, P268, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979.tb00024.x
[8]  
De S., 1986, Decision Support Systems, V2, P309, DOI 10.1016/0167-9236(86)90002-3
[9]   A FOUNDATION FOR THE STUDY OF GROUP DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS [J].
DESANCTIS, G ;
GALLUPE, RB .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1987, 33 (05) :589-609
[10]   COMPUTER-GRAPHICS AS DECISION AIDS - DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH [J].
DESANCTIS, G .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1984, 15 (04) :463-487