POST-MARXISM AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES - BEYOND THE IMPASSE

被引:19
作者
CORBRIDGE, S
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0305-750X(90)90014-O
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
David Booth argues that Marxist development studies cannot escape a metatheoretical commitment to demonstrating the necessity of economic and social patterns, as distinct from explaining them. This paper concurs in respect of neo-Marxism and classical Marxism, each of which suffers from economism, essentialism and epistemological fiat. The paper breaks with Booth in seeing these sins as characteristic also of non-Marxist development studies. It further argues that an emerging post-Marxism is well placed to interpret a world economy itself becoming postmodern. The work of the Regulation School and the postimperialists is outlined as part of this new approach. © 1990 Pergamon Press plc.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 639
页数:17
相关论文
共 133 条
[61]  
Harvey D., 2006, LIMITS CAPITAL
[62]  
HINDEES B, 1984, ECON SOC, V13, P173
[63]  
Hindess B., 1975, PRECAPITALIST MODES
[64]  
HINDESS B, 1983, PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCR
[65]  
HINDESS B, 1976, MODE PRODUCTION SOCI
[66]  
Hirschman A. O., 1982, THEORY EXPERIENCE EC
[67]  
Hirst P. Q., 1985, MARXISM HIST WRITING
[68]  
Hoogvelt A., 1982, 3 WORLD GLOBAL DEV
[69]  
HUNTER ST, 1988, 3RD WORLD Q, V10, P730
[70]  
Jones Gareth Stedman, 1983, LANGUAGES CLASS STUD, P101