THE INFLUENCE OF CONDITIONING SCORES IN PERFORMING DIF ANALYSES

被引:16
作者
ACKERMAN, TA
EVANS, JA
机构
关键词
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING; ITEM BIAS; MANTEL-HAENSZEL PROCEDURE; SIBTEST;
D O I
10.1177/014662169401800404
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The effect of the conditioning score on the results of differential item functioning (DIF) analyses was examined. Most DIF detection procedures match examinees from two groups of interest according to the examinees' test score (e.g., number correct) and then summarize the performance differences across trait levels. DIF has the potential to occur whenever the conditioning criterion cannot account for the multidimensional interaction between items and examinees. Response data were generated from a two-dimensional item response theory model for a 30-item test in which items were measuring uniformly spaced composites of two latent trait parameters, theta1 and theta2. Two different DIF detection methods-the Mantel-Haenszel and simultaneous item bias (SIBTEST) detection procedure-were used for three different sample size conditions. When the DIF procedures were conditioned on the number-correct score or on a transformation of theta1 or theta2, differential group performance followed hypothesized patterns. When the conditioning criterion was a function of both theta1 and theta2 (i.e., when the complete latent space was identified), DIF, as theory would suggest, was eliminated for all items.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 342
页数:14
相关论文
共 16 条
[2]  
ACKERMAN TA, 1992, J EDUC MEAS, V24, P67
[3]  
ACKERMAN TA, 1992, APR ANN M NAT COUNC
[4]  
Dorans N. J., 1993, DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FU, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1002/J.2333-8504.1992.TB01440.X, 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1992.tb01440.x]
[5]   DEMONSTRATING THE UTILITY OF THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH TO ASSESSING UNEXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL ITEM PERFORMANCE ON THE SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE-TEST [J].
DORANS, NJ ;
KULICK, E .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1986, 23 (04) :355-368
[6]  
Holland, 1988, TEST VALIDITY, P129, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[7]  
KIM HR, 1993, APR ANN M AM ED RES
[8]   METHODOLOGY REVIEW - STATISTICAL APPROACHES FOR ASSESSING MEASUREMENT BIAS [J].
MILLSAP, RE ;
EVERSON, HT .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1993, 17 (04) :297-334
[9]   THE DIFFICULTY OF TEST ITEMS THAT MEASURE MORE THAN ONE ABILITY [J].
RECKASE, MD .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1985, 9 (04) :401-412
[10]   THE DISCRIMINATING POWER OF ITEMS THAT MEASURE MORE THAN ONE DIMENSION [J].
RECKASE, MD ;
MCKINLEY, RL .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1991, 15 (04) :361-373