Higher Caesarean Section Rates in Women With Higher Body Mass Index: Are We Managing Labour Differently?

被引:33
作者
Abenhaim, Haim A. [1 ]
Benjamin, Alice [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Royal Victoria Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Obesity; body mass index; Caesarean section; labour management;
D O I
10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34876-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Higher body mass index has been associated with an increased risk of Caesarean section. The effect of differences in labour management on this association has not yet been evaluated. Methods: We conducted a cohort study using data from the McGill Obstetrics and Neonatal Database for deliveries taking place during a 10- year period. Women's BMI at delivery was categorized as normal (20 to 24.9), overweight (25 to 29.9), obese (30 to 39.9), or morbidly obese (>= 40). We evaluated the effect of the management of labour on the need for Caesarean section using unconditional logistic regression models. Results: Data were available for 11 922 women, of whom 2289 women had normal weight, 5663 were overweight, 3730 were obese, and 240 were morbidly obese. After adjustment for known confounding variables, increased BMI category was associated with an overall increase in the use of oxytocin and in the use of epidural analgesia, and with a decrease in use of forceps and vacuum extraction among second stage deliveries. Higher BMI was also found to be associated with earlier decisions to perform a Caesarean section in the second stage of labour. When adjusted for these differences in the management of labour, the increasing rate of Caesarean section observed with increasing BMI category was markedly attenuated (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Women with an increased BMI are managed differently in labour than women of normal weight. This difference in management in part explains the increased rate of Caesarean section observed with higher BMI.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 448
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Effect of prepregnancy body mass index categories on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes
    Abenhaim H.A.
    Kinch R.A.
    Morin L.
    Benjamin A.
    Usher R.
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2007, 275 (1) : 39 - 43
  • [2] Linear association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of caesarean section in term deliveries
    Barau, G.
    Robillard, P-Y
    Hulsey, T. C.
    Dedecker, F.
    Laffite, A.
    Gerardin, P.
    Kauffmann, E.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (10) : 1173 - 1177
  • [3] The role of maternal body mass index in outcomes of vaginal births after cesarean
    Bujold, E
    Hammoud, A
    Schild, C
    Krapp, M
    Baumann, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (04) : 1517 - 1521
  • [4] Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcomes
    Castro, LC
    Avina, RL
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 14 (06) : 601 - 606
  • [5] Colman-Brochu Stephanie, 2004, MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs, V29, P186, DOI 10.1097/00005721-200405000-00010
  • [6] Maternal pre-pregnancy overweight status and obesity as risk factors for cesarean delivery
    Dempsey, JC
    Ashiny, Z
    Qiu, CF
    Miller, RS
    Sorensen, TK
    Williams, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2005, 17 (03) : 179 - 185
  • [7] Thromboembolic disease in pregnancy
    Doyle, NM
    Monga, M
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 31 (02) : 319 - +
  • [8] The impact of maternal obesity and weight gain on vaginal birth after cesarean section success
    Durnwald, CP
    Ehrenberg, HM
    Mercer, BM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (03) : 954 - 957
  • [9] Edomwonyi N P, 2006, East Afr Med J, V83, P112
  • [10] The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery
    Foley, ME
    Alarab, M
    Daly, L
    Keane, D
    Rath, A
    O'Herlihy, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (03) : 891 - 895