PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING A NEW SODIUM PHOSPHATE-BISACODYL REGIMEN WITH CONVENTIONAL PEG-ES LAVAGE FOR OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION

被引:98
作者
AFRIDI, SA [1 ]
BARTHEL, JS [1 ]
KING, PD [1 ]
PINEDA, JJ [1 ]
MARSHALL, JB [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MISSOURI,SCH MED,DIV GASTROENTEROL,COLUMBIA,MO 65212
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(05)80008-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Several recent trials have shown that colonoscopy preparation with sodium phosphate solution is as effective and at least as well tolerated as conventional PEG-ES lavage. These trials utilized two 1.5-fluid oz doses, one given on the evening before colonoscopy and the other early the next morning. Methods: We devised a new sodium phosphate regimen in which the entire dose was given on the evening before examination (1.5 fl oz at 4 PM, 1.5-fl oz at 7 PM and 10 mg of bisacodyl at 10 PM) and performed a prospective, randomized trial that compared it with conventional PEG-ES lavage in terms of quality of colon cleansing, patient tolerance, and safety in an outpatient colonoscopy population with normal renal function. Seventy-two patients received sodium phosphate-bisacodyl and 75 PEG-ES lavage. Results: The overall quality of colon cleansing and frequency of unsatisfactory preparations were similar with both methods. Patients found preparation with sodium phosphate-bisacodyl to be easier than PEG-ES lavage (p = 0.005). No clinically important adverse effects were seen with either method of preparation. The average cost of sodium phosphate-bisacodyl was $4.32 per patient compared with $18.15 for PEG-ES lavage preparation. Conclusion: Preparation with sodium phosphate-bisacodyl, given on the evening before colonoscopy, is a well-tolerated, efficacious, and cost-effective alternative to conventional PEG-ES lavage.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 489
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
DIPALMA JA, 1986, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V81, P652
[2]  
DIPALMA JA, 1989, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V84, P1008
[3]   COMPARISON OF A NEW SULFATE-FREE POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL ELECTROLYTE LAVAGE SOLUTION VERSUS A STANDARD SOLUTION FOR COLONOSCOPY CLEANSING [J].
DIPALMA, JA ;
MARSHALL, JB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1990, 36 (03) :285-289
[4]  
FASS R, 1993, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V88, P929
[5]  
KOLTS BE, 1993, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V88, P1218
[6]  
MARSHALL JB, 1993, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V7, P679
[7]   PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING SODIUM-PHOSPHATE SOLUTION WITH POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL ELECTROLYTE LAVAGE FOR COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION [J].
MARSHALL, JB ;
PINEDA, JJ ;
BARTHEL, JS ;
KING, PD .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1993, 39 (05) :631-634
[8]  
VANNER SJ, 1990, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V85, P422
[9]  
1993, PHYSICIANS DESK REFE, P1021