FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOTIC TECHNIQUES

被引:52
作者
GEMLO, BT [1 ]
BELMONTE, C [1 ]
WILTZ, O [1 ]
MADOFF, RD [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MINNESOTA, DEPT SURG, DIV COLON & RECTAL SURG, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80122-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in deal pouch-anal anastomotic (IPAA) technique include the substitution of a double stapled anastomosis for a mucosectomy and hand-sewn pouch-anal anastomosis, and the use of staples to construct a ''J'' shaped pouch rather than a hand-sewn ''S'' pouch in most cases. METHOD: To determine the impact these technical changes have had on pouch function, 235 IPAA patients with 15 to 155 months of follow-up (mean 70 months) were interviewed by telephone concerning pouch function and quality of life. Categorical responses were then evaluated by contingency table analysis to detect differences between mucosectomy (n = 157) and nonmucosectomy (n = 80) groups, and between J pouch (n = 50), S pouch with mucosectomy (n = 137), and S pouch nonmucosectomy (n = 30) subgroups. An index encompassing nine functional measures tvas used to quantify the overall impact of technique changes (optimal score 100). RESULTS: Stool frequency for mucosectomy patients was 7.2 movements/24 hours, compared to 7.1 for nonmucosectomy patients. Elimination of a mucosectomy dramatically reduced nocturnal major incontinence (P < 0.001), nocturnal minor incontinence (P < 0.001), day-time minor incontinence (P = 0.03), and day-time pad use (P = 0.002), Nonmucosectomy patients had a better functional index score than had patients with an S pouch, even when only data from nonmucosectomy patients were analyzed (J = 95.5, S = 91.8, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Avoidance of a mucosectomy in the performance of an deal pouch-anal anastomosis does not influence stool frequency but does significantly improve fecal continence and introduces no detectable morbidity associated with the retained rectal mucosa.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 142
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   PROCTOCOLECTOMY AND ILEOANAL POUCH ANASTOMOSIS WITHOUT CONSERVATION OF A RECTAL MUSCULAR CUFF [J].
CHAUSSADE, S ;
VERDURON, A ;
HAUTEFEUILLE, M ;
RISLEIGHT, G ;
GUERRE, J ;
COUTURIER, D ;
VALLEUR, P ;
HAUTEFEUILLE, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1989, 76 (03) :273-275
[2]   COMPARISON BETWEEN ANAL ENDOSONOGRAPHY AND DIGITAL EXAMINATION IN THE EVALUATION OF ANAL FISTULAS [J].
CHOEN, S ;
BURNETT, S ;
BARTRAM, CI ;
NICHOLLS, RJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (04) :445-447
[3]  
JARVINEN HJ, 1993, ANN CHIR GYNAECOL FE, V82, P159
[4]   PRESERVATION OF THE ENTIRE ANAL-CANAL IN CONSERVATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY FOR ULCERATIVE-COLITIS - A PILOT-STUDY COMPARING END-TO-END ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS WITHOUT MUCOSAL RESECTION WITH MUCOSAL PROCTECTOMY AND ENDO-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS [J].
JOHNSTON, D ;
HOLDSWORTH, PJ ;
NASMYTH, DG ;
NEAL, DE ;
PRIMROSE, JN ;
WOMACK, N ;
AXON, ATR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 74 (10) :940-944
[6]   TOTALLY STAPLED ABDOMINAL RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY [J].
KMIOT, WA ;
KEIGHLEY, MRB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1989, 76 (09) :961-964
[7]  
LILJEQVIST L, 1988, DIS COLON RECTUM, V31, P929
[8]  
LUUKKONEN P, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P437
[9]  
MARCELLO PW, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P500
[10]   S-POUCHES VS J-POUCHES - A COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES [J].
MCHUGH, SM ;
DIAMANT, NE ;
MCLEOD, R ;
COHEN, Z .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1987, 30 (09) :671-677