FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOTIC TECHNIQUES

被引:52
作者
GEMLO, BT [1 ]
BELMONTE, C [1 ]
WILTZ, O [1 ]
MADOFF, RD [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MINNESOTA, DEPT SURG, DIV COLON & RECTAL SURG, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80122-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in deal pouch-anal anastomotic (IPAA) technique include the substitution of a double stapled anastomosis for a mucosectomy and hand-sewn pouch-anal anastomosis, and the use of staples to construct a ''J'' shaped pouch rather than a hand-sewn ''S'' pouch in most cases. METHOD: To determine the impact these technical changes have had on pouch function, 235 IPAA patients with 15 to 155 months of follow-up (mean 70 months) were interviewed by telephone concerning pouch function and quality of life. Categorical responses were then evaluated by contingency table analysis to detect differences between mucosectomy (n = 157) and nonmucosectomy (n = 80) groups, and between J pouch (n = 50), S pouch with mucosectomy (n = 137), and S pouch nonmucosectomy (n = 30) subgroups. An index encompassing nine functional measures tvas used to quantify the overall impact of technique changes (optimal score 100). RESULTS: Stool frequency for mucosectomy patients was 7.2 movements/24 hours, compared to 7.1 for nonmucosectomy patients. Elimination of a mucosectomy dramatically reduced nocturnal major incontinence (P < 0.001), nocturnal minor incontinence (P < 0.001), day-time minor incontinence (P = 0.03), and day-time pad use (P = 0.002), Nonmucosectomy patients had a better functional index score than had patients with an S pouch, even when only data from nonmucosectomy patients were analyzed (J = 95.5, S = 91.8, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Avoidance of a mucosectomy in the performance of an deal pouch-anal anastomosis does not influence stool frequency but does significantly improve fecal continence and introduces no detectable morbidity associated with the retained rectal mucosa.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 142
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]  
MCINTYRE PB, 1994, DIS COLON RECTUM, V37, P303
[12]   COMPARISON OF THE FUNCTION OF TRIPLICATED AND DUPLICATED PELVIC ILEAL RESERVOIRS AFTER MUCOSAL PROCTECTOMY AND ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS FOR ULCERATIVE-COLITIS AND ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS [J].
NASMYTH, DG ;
WILLIAMS, NS ;
JOHNSTON, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (05) :361-366
[13]   PROCTOCOLECTOMY WITH ILEAL RESERVOIR AND ANAL ANASTOMOSIS [J].
PARKS, AG ;
NICHOLLS, RJ ;
BELLIVEAU, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1980, 67 (08) :533-538
[14]   CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AFTER RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY [J].
PESCATORI, M ;
MATTANA, C ;
CASTAGNETO, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 75 (04) :321-324
[15]   FACTORS AFFECTING ANAL CONTINENCE AFTER RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY [J].
PESCATORI, M ;
MATTANA, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1990, 5 (04) :213-218
[16]   CARCINOMA OF THE RECTAL POUCH FOLLOWING RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY - REPORT OF A CASE [J].
PUTHU, D ;
RAJAN, N ;
RAO, R ;
RAO, L ;
VENUGOPAL, P .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1992, 35 (03) :257-260
[17]   RETAINED MUCOSA AFTER DOUBLE-STAPLED ILEAL RESERVOIR AND ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS [J].
SCHMITT, SL ;
WEXNER, SD ;
LUCAS, FV ;
JAMES, K ;
NOGUERAS, JJ ;
JAGELMAN, DG .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1992, 35 (11) :1051-1056
[18]   CANCER IN AN ILEOANAL RESERVOIR - A NEW LATE COMPLICATION [J].
STERN, H ;
WALFISCH, S ;
MULLEN, B ;
MCLEOD, R ;
COHEN, Z .
GUT, 1990, 31 (04) :473-475
[19]  
Utsunomiya J, 1989, Z Gastroenterol Verh, V24, P249
[20]   THE ILEOANAL RESERVOIR [J].
WEXNER, SD ;
WONG, WD ;
ROTHENBERGER, DA ;
GOLDBERG, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 159 (01) :178-185