COMPARISON OF BETA-ARTEMETHER AND BETA-ARTEETHER AGAINST MALARIA PARASITES INVITRO AND INVIVO

被引:41
作者
SHMUKLARSKY, MJ
KLAYMAN, DL
MILHOUS, WK
KYLE, DE
ROSSAN, RN
AGER, AL
TANG, DB
HEIFFER, MH
CANFIELD, CJ
SCHUSTER, BG
机构
[1] WALTER REED ARMY INST RES, DIV BIOMETR, WASHINGTON, DC 20307 USA
[2] GORGAS MEM LAB, PANAMA CITY, PANAMA
[3] UNIV MIAMI, SCH MED, CTR TROP PARASIT DIS, MIAMI, FL 33152 USA
[4] PHARMACEUT SYST INC, GAITHERSBURG, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.4269/ajtmh.1993.48.377
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The antimalarial activity of beta-artemether and beta-arteether was compared in three test systems: in vitro against chloroquine-resistant and chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum parasites, in mice infected with P. berghei, and in Aotus monkeys infected with chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum. In vitro, the mean 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) for beta-artemether was 1.74 nM (range 1.34-1.81 nM), and this value for beta-arteether was 1.61 nM (range 1.57-1.92 nM). They were approximately 2.5-fold more potent than artemisinin, which had a mean IC50 of 4.11 nM (range 3.36-4.60 nM). In the mouse model, the 50% curative doses (CD50) of beta-artemether and beta-arteether had a mean value of 55 mg/kg (32-78 mg/kg). The 50% effective curative doses (ED50) in the Aotus monkey were 7.1 mg/kg (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.7-13.5) for beta-artemether and 11.8 mg/kg (95% CI = 6.5-21.3) for beta-arteether. Overall, the activities of the two drugs were comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[21]   MALARIA - RESURGENCE, RESISTANCE, AND RESEARCH .1. [J].
WYLER, DJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 308 (15) :875-878
[22]  
1982, J TRAD CLIN MED, V2, P45