POROSITY DEPTH TRENDS IN RESERVOIR SANDSTONES - THEORETICAL-MODELS RELATED TO JURASSIC SANDSTONES OFFSHORE NORWAY

被引:118
作者
RAMM, M
机构
[1] Department of Geology, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo 3, Box 1047, Blindern
关键词
SANDSTONE POROSITY DEPTH TRENDS; PRESSURE SOLUTION; RESERVOIR PROPERTIES;
D O I
10.1016/0264-8172(92)90066-N
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Theoretical models of compaction and porosity modification in sandstones during burial are discussed. Theory predicts that mechanical compaction is the dominant porosity reducing mechanism during burial from 0 to 2.5-3 km. Porosity-depth trends are at this stage mainly controlled by the stability of the grain framework and the effective stress. Time and temperature also influence the porosity-depth gradients at shallow to moderate depths, but are probably less important than effective stress and framework grain composition. At greater burial depths, below 2.5-3 km, chemical compaction, including pressure solution, can explain most of the porosity reduction in well sorted clean arenites. Theoretical modelling of the intergranular pressure solution suggests that sandstones may lose porosity rapidly by this mechanism below 2.5-3 km and that factors capable of retarding pressure solution and quartz cementation are required to maintain prospective porosities below 4 km. This theory and comparisons with empirical data from Jurassic sandstones from offshore Norway indicate that high porosity is favoured by (1) overpressures approaching the lithostatic pressure gradient, (2) a short residence time below 3 km burial, (3) coatings on grains, of clay or microcrystalline quartz which prevent quartz dissolution and precipitation and (4) a high content of feldspar and early diagenetic secondary pores. Early hydrocarbon emplacement may retard quartz cementation and preserve porosity, but chemical compaction probably continues after oil emplacement, except at very high hydrocarbon saturations.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 567
页数:15
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [41] Kumar, Morjaria, Mukherjee, Numerical integration of some stiff constitutive models of inelastic deformation, J. Engin. Mater. Technol., 102, pp. 92-96, (1980)
  • [42] Leder, Park, Porosity reduction in sandstone by quartz overgrowth, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 70, pp. 1713-1728, (1986)
  • [43] Maxwell, Influence of depth, temperature, and geologic age on porosity of quartzose sandstone, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 48, pp. 697-709, (1964)
  • [44] Merino, Ortoleva, Strickholm, Generation of evenly-spaced pressure-solution seams during (late) diagenesis: a kinetic theory, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 82, pp. 360-370, (1983)
  • [45] Mitra, Beard, Theoretic models of porosity reduction by pressure solution for well-sorted sandstones, J. Sedim. Petrol., 50, pp. 1347-1360, (1980)
  • [46] Nagtegaal, Sandstone-framework instability as a function of burial diagenesis, J. Geol. Soc. London, 135, pp. 101-105, (1978)
  • [47] Nedkvitne, Karlsen, Bjorlykke, Larter, The relationship between reservoir diagenetic evolution and petroleum emplacement in the Ula field, North Sea, Clastic Diagenesis and Oil Emplacement in Some Mesozoic Sandstone Reservoirs from the North Sea (T. Nedkvitne), (1991)
  • [48] Palm, Rayleigh convection, mass transport and change in porosity in layers of sandstone, J. Geophys. Res., 95, pp. 8675-8679, (1990)
  • [49] Palmer, Barton, Porosity reduction, microfabric and resultant lithification in UK uncemented sands, Diagenesis of Sedimentary Sequences, pp. 29-40, (1987)
  • [50] Pryor, Permeability-porosity patterns and variations in some Holocene sand bodies, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 57, pp. 162-189, (1973)