PARK MANAGEMENT OF EXOTIC PLANT-SPECIES - PROBLEMS AND ISSUES

被引:72
作者
WESTMAN, WE
机构
[1] Applied Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00286.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Abstract: Vegetation management policies in public parks in the United States call for the removal of exotic species to the extent feasible. The underlying goal is to preserve samples of wilderness by restoring plant communities to the “natural state” that existed prior to extensive human influence. With limited budgets, park managers are necessarily selective in targeting exotic species for control. If the focus is on the more readily controlled species, however, park landscapes may gradually become populated by more resistant exotics Further, because plants exhibit some redundancy in ecosystem function, exotic plant species can substitute in part for natives in performing a range of ecosystem functions, including wildlife support and soil binding. Consequently the removal of exotics can result in significant perturbations to certain ecosystem functions during the period of transition to native cover. The individualistic paradigm of plant distribution implies that the impact of exotic plant species on invaded communities will vary. Choosing which species to remove requires careful evaluation of the impact of the removal on ecosystem structure and function. The effective balancing of park management goals for wilderness maintenance and recreational use requires clearer recognition of the adaptive response of ecosystems to invasion and a rethinking of the bases for prioritizing which species are to be removed. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 260
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[41]  
Orians G.H., Site characteristics favoring invasions, Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii, pp. 133-148, (1986)
[42]  
Pennington W., Lags in adjustment of vegetation to climate caused by the pace of soil development: evidence from Britain, Vegetatio, 67, pp. 105-118, (1986)
[43]  
Peters R., Darling J., The greenhouse effect and nature reserves, BioScience, 35, pp. 707-717, (1985)
[44]  
Pimm S.L., Gilpin M.E., Theoretical issues in conservation biology, Perspectives in theoretical ecology, pp. 287-305, (1989)
[45]  
Raven P., Axelrod D., Origin and relationships of the California flora, University of California Publications in Botany, 72, pp. 1-134, (1978)
[46]  
Ripley J.D., Plants of Angel Island, Marin County, California, Great Basin Naturalist, 40, pp. 385-407, (1980)
[47]  
Roughgarden J., The structure and assembly of communities, Perspectives in theoretical ecology, pp. 203-226, (1989)
[48]  
Rummel J., Roughgarden J., A theory of faunal buildup for competition communities, Evolution, 43, pp. 1009-1033, (1985)
[49]  
Schultz A.M., Launchbaugh J.L., Biswell H.H., Relationship between grass density and brush seedling survival, Ecology, 36, pp. 226-238, (1955)
[50]  
Simberloff D., Introduced insects: a biogeographic and systematic perspective, Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii, pp. 3-26, (1986)