ANOTHER INTERPRETATION OF A MODEL FOR PAIRED COMPARISONS

[1] RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS .1. THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1952, 39 (3-4) : 324 - 345

[2] SOME STATISTICAL METHODS IN TASTE TESTING AND QUALITY EVALUATION [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1953, 9 (01) : 22 - 38

[3] A new measure of rank correlation [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1938, 30 : 81 - 93

[4] THE POWER OF RANK TESTS [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1953, 24 (01): : 23 - 43

[5] LUCE RD, 1959, INDIVIDUAL CHOICE BE, pCH1

[6] PENDERGRASS RN, 1960, CONTRIBUTIONS PROBAB, P331

[7] SAVAGE IR, 1956, ANN MATH STATIST, V27, P580

[8] THOMPSON WA, CHARACTERIZATION BRA

[9] WILCOXON F, 1963, BIOMETRICS, V19, P385

[1] RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS .1. THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1952, 39 (3-4) : 324 - 345

[2] SOME STATISTICAL METHODS IN TASTE TESTING AND QUALITY EVALUATION [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1953, 9 (01) : 22 - 38

[3] A new measure of rank correlation [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1938, 30 : 81 - 93

[4] THE POWER OF RANK TESTS [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1953, 24 (01): : 23 - 43

[5] LUCE RD, 1959, INDIVIDUAL CHOICE BE, pCH1

[6] PENDERGRASS RN, 1960, CONTRIBUTIONS PROBAB, P331

[7] SAVAGE IR, 1956, ANN MATH STATIST, V27, P580

[8] THOMPSON WA, CHARACTERIZATION BRA

[9] WILCOXON F, 1963, BIOMETRICS, V19, P385