PSEUDOARTHROSIS RATE AFTER ALLOGRAFT POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITH PEDICLE SCREW AND PLATE FIXATION

被引:86
作者
BRANTIGAN, JW
机构
[1] Cleveland Spine and Arthritis Center, Cleveland, OH
[2] Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, 68131
关键词
ALLOGRAFT BONE; ETHYLENE OXIDE; FUSION; LUMBAR SPINE; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; VARIABLE SCREW PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199405310-00014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Twenty-five of 26 consecutive patients were studied after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using ethylene oxide-sterilized allograft bone for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and autologous bone for posterolateral fusion with posterior fixation using pedicle screws and variable screw placement plates. Objectives. Patients were studied at 1 year to determine rate of complications, pseudarthrosis, and re-operations. Methods. Clinical success was determined by combined five-point analog pain and function scales. Fusion success was determined by plain radiographs. Results. Complications occurred in four of 25 patients (16%). Re-operations were done in nine of 25 patients (36%) with seven re-operations (28%) to treat frank failures of the donor bone. Although some patients subsequently improved with repeat surgery, the result of the donor bone posterior lumbar interbody fusion was excellent in nine patients, good in four, fair in eight, and poor in four. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion success was achieved in 14 of 25 patients (56%). Clinical success was achieved in 15 of 25 patients (60%). Conclusions. Although the mechanical principles of posterior lumbar interbody fusion were affirmed, the adequacy of ethylene oxide-sterilized allograft bone in meeting the mechanical and biologic needs of posterior lumbar interbody fusion was questioned.
引用
收藏
页码:1271 / 1279
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Ani N., Keppler L., Biscup R.S., Steffee A.D., Reduction of high-grade slips (Grades III—V) with VSP instrumentation Report of a series of 41 cases, Spine, 16, pp. 302-310, (1991)
  • [2] Branch C.L., Branch CL. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the keystone graft: Technique and result, Surg Neurol, 27, pp. 449-454, (1987)
  • [3] Brantigan J.W., Cunningham B.W., Warden K., McAfee P.C., Steffee A.D., Compression strength of allograft bone for PLIF, Spine, 18, pp. 1213-1221, (1993)
  • [4] Brantigan J.W., Cunningham B.W., Warden K., McAfee P.C., Steffee A.D., Interbody Lumbar Fusion Using a Carbon Fiber Cage Implant Vs. Allograft Bone an Investigational Study in the Spanish Goat
  • [5] Brantigan J.W., Steffee A.D., Keppler L., Biscup R.S., Enker P., Posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique using the variable screw placement spinal fixation system, Spine: State of the Art Reviews, pp. 175-200, (1992)
  • [6] Brodsky A.E., Kovalsky E.S., Khalil M.A., Correlation of radiologic assessment of lumbar spine fusions with surgical exploration, Spine, 16, pp. 261-265, (1991)
  • [7] Carson W.L., Redman R.S., Richards K., Lin J., Bending Stiffness, Flexibility, and Strength of VSP, Isola, CD, TSRH, and Luque Longitudinal Member to Bone Screw Connection Subconstructs
  • [8] Cleveland M., Bosworth D.M., Thompson F.R., Pseudoarthrosis in the lumbosacral spine, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 30, pp. 302-312, (1948)
  • [9] Cloward R.B., Spondylolisthesis: Treatment by laminectomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Clin Orthop, 154, pp. 74-82, (1981)
  • [10] Cloward R.B., The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion, J Neurosurg, 10, pp. 154-168, (1953)