SEX BIAS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PERSONALITY-DISORDERS - CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES

被引:69
作者
WIDIGER, TA
SPITZER, RL
机构
[1] CORNELL UNIV, COLL MED, ITHACA, NY 14853 USA
[2] COLUMBIA UNIV, NEW YORK, NY 10027 USA
[3] NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIAT INST & HOSP, NEW YORK, NY 10032 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0272-7358(91)90135-H
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The hypothesis that the DSM-III-R personality disorders are sex biased is a co ntroversial issue of considerable importance. The effort to resolve this issue empirically, however, has been flawed by conceptual and methodological problems that have contributed to a misinterpretation of research findings and to a perpetuation of inadequate research methodologies. This review emphasizes in particular the failure to distinguish between various types and sources of sex bias, including etiologic, sampling, diagnostic, assessment, and criterion bias. The importance of these distinctions is illustrated in a review of studies concerned with the relationship of patient sex to the diagnosis of personality disorders and to the assessment of personality disorder criteria. The optimal methodology to identify criterion sex bias is discussed. It is suggested that in order for the sex bias controversy to be resolved, future research needs to delineate the nature of personality disorder pathology and the boundaries between abnormal and normal personality functioning. © 1991.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 98 条
[12]  
CAPLAN AL, 1981, CONCEPTS HLTH DISEAS
[13]  
CAPLAN PJ, 1987, J PERSONALITY DISORD, V1, P178
[14]  
CARMEN FH, 1981, AM J PSYCHIAT, V138, P1319
[15]  
CHODOFF P, 1982, AM J PSYCHIAT, V139, P545
[16]  
COLLIGAN RC, 1983, MMPI CONT NORMATIVE
[17]  
COOPER A, 1987, DIAGNOSIS CLASSIFICA, P290
[18]  
Dahlstrom W. G., 1972, MMPI HDB, VI
[19]   SEX BIAS IN CLINICAL JUDGMENT - LATER EMPIRICAL RETURNS [J].
DAVIDSON, CV ;
ABRAMOWITZ, SI .
PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY, 1980, 4 (03) :377-395
[20]   REPRESENTATIVE THINKING IN CLINICAL JUDGMENT [J].
DAWES, RM .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1986, 6 (05) :425-441