HARDNESS AND YOUNG MODULUS DETERMINED BY NANOINDENTATION TECHNIQUE OF FILLER PARTICLES OF DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS COMPARED WITH HUMAN ENAMEL

被引:142
作者
WILLEMS, G
CELIS, JP
LAMBRECHTS, P
BRAEM, M
VANHERLE, G
机构
[1] KATHOLIEKE UNIV LEUVEN,DEPT MET & MAT ENGN,B-3001 LOUVAIN,BELGIUM
[2] ANTWERP STATE UNIV CTR,DIV DENT MORPHOL & ORAL PHYSIOL,B-2020 ANTWERP,BELGIUM
来源
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH | 1993年 / 27卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/jbm.820270607
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The recently developed nanoindentation technique was used to measure hardness and Young's modulus of small filler particles in resin composites and other dental restoratives. This technique eliminates the need to visualize indentations. Load and displacement are continuously monitored during a loading-unloading sequence, and hardness as well as Young's modulus are then calculated from the load-displacement curves taking into account the geometry of the indenter. Thirteen posterior composites, 3 dental ceramics for CAD/CAM restorations, 1 sintered porcelain, and 1 amalgam were investigated in this study. The results were compared to the hardness and Young's modulus determined by nanoindentation of human enamel. Of the dental materials tested, only five materials contain inorganic filler particles with a nanohardness not statistically different from that of enamel. The predominant fillers in all other materials, except amalgam and the prepolymerized resin fillers in Bell Firm PX, were found to be significantly harder. The dental restorative materials, except the alloy phase in amalgam, were composed of particles with a Young's modulus significantly lower than that of human enamel. The alloy phase in amalgam had a Young's modulus value comparable to that of enamel.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 755
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   THE IMPACT OF COMPOSITE STRUCTURE ON ITS ELASTIC RESPONSE [J].
BRAEM, M ;
LAMBRECHTS, P ;
VANDOREN, V ;
VANHERLE, G .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1986, 65 (05) :648-653
[2]   MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES AND FILLER FRACTION OF DENTAL COMPOSITES [J].
BRAEM, M ;
FINGER, W ;
VANDOREN, VE ;
LAMBRECHTS, P ;
VANHERLE, G .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1989, 5 (05) :346-349
[3]  
CALDWELL ROBERT C., 1957, JOUR DENTAL RES, V36, P732, DOI 10.1177/00220345570360051401
[4]   EXCESSIVE WEAR OF NATURAL TOOTH STRUCTURE BY OPPOSING COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS [J].
CHAPMAN, RJ ;
NATHANSON, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 106 (01) :51-53
[5]  
CRAIG G, 1989, RESTORATIVE DENTAL M, P65
[6]   A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments [J].
Doerner, M. F. ;
Nix, W. D. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1986, 1 (04) :601-609
[7]  
GROSSMAN DG, 1991, INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER RESTORATIONS, P103
[8]   ABRASIVE WEAR, TENSILE-STRENGTH, AND HARDNESS OF DENTAL COMPOSITE RESINS - IS THERE A RELATIONSHIP [J].
HARRISON, A ;
DRAUGHN, RA .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1976, 36 (04) :395-398
[9]  
HEGDAHL T, 1972, SCAND J DENT RES, V80, P449
[10]   SEM AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE RESINS [J].
HOSODA, H ;
YAMADA, T ;
INOKOSHI, S .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1990, 64 (06) :669-676