Diversification and Performance: Linking Relatedness, Market Structure, and the Decision to Diversify

被引:9
作者
Adner, Ron [1 ]
Zemsky, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Tuck Sch Business, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] INSEAD, F-77300 Fontainebleau, France
关键词
diversification discount; horizontal scope of the firm; formal foundations of strategy;
D O I
10.1287/stsc.2015.0006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
An extensive empirical literature in strategy and finance studies the performance implications of corporate diversification. Two core debates in the literature concern the existence of a diversification discount and the relative importance of industry relatedness and market structure for the performance of diversifiers. We address these debates by building a formal model in which the extent of diversification is endogenous and depends on the degree of industry relatedness. Firms' diversification choices affect both their own competitiveness and market structure. We find a nonmonotonic effect of relatedness on performance: whereas greater relatedness increases the competitiveness of diversified firms, it can also spur additional diversification, thereby eroding market structure and performance. In this way, our theory also elucidates how heterogeneity in firm scope strategies can emerge even when firms are initially identical. We use the model to generate data and show how the negative effect of relatedness on market structure can give rise to spurious inference of a diversification discount in cross-sectional regressions. We extend our model to show how increases in relatedness can lead to both entry and exit dynamics. A second extension investigates the conditions under which resource endowments make firms more or less likely to diversify.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 55
页数:24
相关论文
共 63 条
[21]  
Gimeno J, 1999, ACAD MANAGE J, V42, P239, DOI 10.2307/256917
[22]   Optimal diversification: Reconciling theory and evidence [J].
Gomes, J ;
Livdan, D .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2004, 59 (02) :507-535
[23]   Does corporate diversification destroy value? [J].
Graham, JR ;
Lemmon, ML ;
Wolf, JG .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (02) :695-720
[24]   SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS AS A SPECIFICATION ERROR [J].
HECKMAN, JJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (01) :153-161
[25]   The product space conditions the development of nations [J].
Hidalgo, C. A. ;
Klinger, B. ;
Barabasi, A.-L. ;
Hausmann, R. .
SCIENCE, 2007, 317 (5837) :482-487
[26]   MULTIPLE POINT COMPETITION [J].
KARNANI, A ;
WERNERFELT, B .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1985, 6 (01) :87-96
[27]  
KATZ ML, 1985, AM ECON REV, V75, P424
[28]   Technological platforms and diversification [J].
Kim, DJ ;
Kogut, B .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1996, 7 (03) :283-301
[29]   TOBIN Q, CORPORATE DIVERSIFICATION, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE [J].
LANG, LHP ;
STULZ, RM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1994, 102 (06) :1248-1280
[30]   OPPORTUNITY COSTS AND NON-SCALE FREE CAPABILITIES: PROFIT MAXIMIZATION, CORPORATE SCOPE, AND PROFIT MARGINS [J].
Levinthal, Daniel A. ;
Wu, Brian .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (07) :780-801