DETECTION OF AROCLOR, DDT, MALATHION AND HCB USING SEMIPERMEABLE MEMBRANES AS CONCENTRATION METHOD

被引:10
作者
DELATORRE, AI [1 ]
FERNANDEZ, C [1 ]
TARAZONA, JV [1 ]
MUNOZ, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] CISA,INIA,DIV ENVIRONM TOXICOL,E-28130 MADRID,SPAIN
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0045-6535(95)00128-U
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) containing 1 g of triolein were used to extract pp'-DDT (DDT), hexachlorobenzene (HCB), malathion and aroclor 1254 from aqueous samples. Recoveries higher than 95% were analytically confirmed for DDT and HCB using GC-MS after an extraction with n-hexane or methylene chloride. Different approaches were made to combine this concentration method with biological detection systems using toxicity tests on Daphnia magna. Direct assays, introducing the exposed membrane into the exposure flask, gave negative results due to the adhesion of the animals to the membrane. Similar negative results were observed when triolein aliquots were directly mixed with the water in the exposure chamber. Finally, the capability of dimetylsulfoxide as solvent (DMSO) was assayed. DMSO war, chosen because of its compatibility with ecotoxicity assessments. Membranes were dialysed twice with DMSO. The toxicity of dimethylsulfoxide extracts to Daphnia magna was assessed by the standard acute toxicity test modified for low volume assays. HCB containing extracts were slightly toxic, while no toxicity was observed for DDT, malathion and aroclor 1254. Chemical analysis confirmed a very low recovery, less than 10%; aroclor was not quantified. Data show that although DMSO is a very good solvent for toxicity studies, it can not be used to extract lipophilic pollutants from triolein devices. Nevertheless, the capability of these devices to concentrate hydrophobic pollutants has been confirmed, and new efforts to combine this concentration method with toxicological detection systems are required. The possibilities of these methods are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:2727 / 2737
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
BARERA Y, 1983, AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY H
[2]  
BRORASMUSSEN F, 1994, REV ENVIRON CONTAM T, V137, P83
[3]   BIOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVES TO CHEMICAL-IDENTIFICATION FOR THE ECOTOXICOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS - THE RTG-2 IN-VITRO CYTOTOXICITY TEST [J].
CASTANO, A ;
VEGA, M ;
BLAZQUEZ, T ;
TARAZONA, JV .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1994, 13 (10) :1607-1611
[4]   USE OF BONDED PHASE SILICA SORBENTS FOR THE SAMPLING OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS IN WASTEWATERS [J].
CHLADEK, E ;
MARANO, RS .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC SCIENCE, 1984, 22 (08) :313-320
[5]  
DURHAN EJ, 1990, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V29, P463
[6]  
GOMARIZ MVB, 1994, REV TOXICOL, V11, P92
[7]  
GREINER P, 1992, CHEM EXPOSURE PREDIC, P205
[8]   SEMIPERMEABLE-MEMBRANE DEVICES CONTAINING MODEL LIPID - A NEW APPROACH TO MONITORING THE BIOAVAILABILITY OF LIPOPHILIC CONTAMINANTS AND ESTIMATING THEIR BIOCONCENTRATION POTENTIAL [J].
HUCKINS, JN ;
TUBERGEN, MW ;
MANUWEERA, GK .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1990, 20 (05) :533-552
[9]   ORGANICS IN WATER - SOLID-PHASE EXTRACTION ON A SMALL-SCALE [J].
JUNK, GA ;
RICHARD, JJ .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1988, 60 (05) :451-454
[10]   HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC METHOD FOR ISOLATING ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS FROM TISSUE AND SEDIMENT EXTRACTS [J].
KRAHN, MM ;
MOORE, LK ;
BOGAR, RG ;
WIGREN, CA ;
CHAN, SL ;
BROWN, DW .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1988, 437 (01) :161-175