区域生态安全评价方法综述

被引:72
作者
庞雅颂
王琳
机构
[1] 中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院
关键词
生态安全; 理论框架; 评价方法;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X826 [生物评价、生态评价];
学科分类号
1402 ;
摘要
本研究比较了生态安全与其他相关概念(生态风险、生态系统健康、生态系统服务功能和生态承载力)之间的关系,对生态安全理论框架(PSR、PISR、DPSIR、DSR和DPSER)和评价方法(熵权法、主成分分析法、层次分析法、灰色关联分析法、模糊综合评价法、人工神经网络、物元分析法、生态足迹、景观生态安全模型、数字生态安全模型)进行的总结,分析比较了各方法的优缺点,并展望了区域生态安全评价方法的发展方向。
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 344
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]  
Eco-security Monitoring Index System for Urban Development Zone[J] . Xiaocui Zhou,Zhifeng Yang,Linyu Xu.Procedia Environmental Sciences . 2010
[12]  
Ecological Security Assessment of Yuan River Watershed Based on Landscape Pattern and Soil Erosion[J] . Zhaoling Zhang,Shiliang Liu,Shikui Dong.Procedia Environmental Sciences . 2010
[13]   A model for ecological assessment to pesticide pollution management [J].
Jiang, Jiexian ;
Wan, Nianfeng .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2009, 220 (15) :1844-1851
[14]  
An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies[J] . Rajesh Kumar Singh,H.R. Murty,S.K. Gupta,A.K. Dikshit.Ecological Indicators . 2008 (2)
[15]  
Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality—A case study of Hunan Province, China[J] . Xiong Ying,Guang-Ming Zeng,Gui-Qiu Chen,Lin Tang,Ke-Lin Wang,Dao-You Huang.Ecological Modelling . 2007 (2)
[16]  
The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status[J] . Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science . 2005 (1)
[17]  
Accounting for uncertainty factors in biodiversity impact assessment: lessons from a case study[J] . D. Geneletti,E. Beinat,C.F. Chung,A.G. Fabbri,H.J. Scholten.Environmental Impact Assessment Review . 2003 (4)
[18]   Using resistance and resilience measurements for 'fitness' tests in ecosystem health [J].
Whitford, WG ;
Rapport, DJ ;
deSoyza, AG .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1999, 57 (01) :21-29
[19]   Assessing ecosystem health [J].
Rapport, DJ ;
Costanza, R ;
McMichael, AJ .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1998, 13 (10) :397-402
[20]  
Towards Sustainable Development: Environmental Indicators .2 OECD. OECD . 1998