Ties That Last: Tie Formation and Persistence in Research Collaborations over Time

被引:244
作者
Dahlander, Linus [1 ]
McFarland, Daniel A. [2 ]
机构
[1] ESMT, D-10178 Berlin, Germany
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
research collaborations; network ties; tie formation; tie persistence; long-term ties; task relationships; SOCIAL-STRUCTURE; NETWORK STRUCTURE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; ORGANIZATIONS; POWER; DISSOLUTION; EMBEDDEDNESS; INNOVATION; DYNAMICS; DURATION;
D O I
10.1177/0001839212474272
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using a longitudinal dataset of research collaborations over 15 years at Stanford University, we build a theory of intraorganizational task relationships that distinguishes the different factors associated with the formation and persistence of network ties. We highlight six factors: shared organizational foci, shared traits and interests, tie advantages from popularity, tie reinforcement from third parties, tie strength and multiplexity, and the instrumental returns from the products of ties. Findings suggest that ties form when unfamiliar people identify desirable and matching traits in potential partners. By contrast, ties persist when familiar people reflect on the quality of their relationship and shared experiences. The former calls for shallow, short-term strategies for assessing a broad array of potential ties; the latter calls for long-term strategies and substantive assessments of a relationship's worth so as to draw extended rewards from the association. This suggests that organizational activities geared toward sustaining persistent intraorganizational task relationships need to be different from activities aimed at forging new ones.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 110
页数:42
相关论文
共 107 条
[81]   Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences [J].
Powell, WW ;
White, DR ;
Koput, KW ;
Owen-Smith, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 110 (04) :1132-1205
[82]  
Price DJS., 1963, Little science, big science and beyond
[83]   Influence flows in the academy: Using affiliation networks to assess peer effects among researchers [J].
Rawlings, Craig M. ;
McFarland, Daniel A. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2011, 40 (03) :1001-1017
[84]   Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range [J].
Reagans, R ;
McEvily, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2003, 48 (02) :240-267
[85]   Close Encounters: Analyzing How Social Similarity and Propinquity Contribute to Strong Network Connections [J].
Reagans, Ray .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (04) :835-849
[86]   An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks [J].
Robins, Garry ;
Pattison, Pip ;
Kalish, Yuval ;
Lusher, Dean .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2007, 29 (02) :173-191
[87]   The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among US entrepreneur [J].
Ruef, M ;
Aldrich, HE ;
Carter, NM .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2003, 68 (02) :195-222
[88]   Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation [J].
Ruef, M .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2002, 11 (03) :427-449
[89]   BASES AND USE OF POWER IN ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION MAKING - CASE OF A UNIVERSITY [J].
SALANCIK, GR ;
PFEFFER, J .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1974, 19 (04) :453-473
[90]  
SEABRIGHT MA, 1992, ACAD MANAGE J, V35, P122, DOI 10.5465/256475