Are RTA agreements with environmental provisions reducing emissions?

被引:120
作者
Baghdadi, Leila [1 ]
Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada [2 ,3 ]
Zitouna, Habib [4 ]
机构
[1] Tunis Univ, Tunis Business Sch, Tunis, Tunisia
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Econ, Castellon de La Plana 12071, Spain
[3] Univ Jaume 1, Inst Int Econ, Castellon de La Plana 12071, Spain
[4] Univ Carthage, Tunisia Polytech Sch, Tunis, Tunisia
关键词
Regional trade agreements; Environmental provisions; Convergence; CO2; emissions; Matching; Difference-in-differences; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.04.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates whether RTAs with environmental provisions affect relative and absolute pollution levels. In order to do so, the determinants of carbon dioxide emissions convergence are estimated for a cross-section of 182 countries over the period 1980 to 2008. A propensity score matching approach is combined with difference-in-differences techniques to effectively isolate the effect of the Regional Trade Agreement (RTA) variable. The usual controls for scale, composition and technique effects are added to the estimated model and the endogeneity of income and trade variables is modeled using instruments. The main results indicate that the CO2 emissions of the pairs of countries that belong to an RTA with environmental provisions tend to converge and are lower in absolute terms, whereas this is not the case for RTAs without environmental provisions. As regards specific agreements, we find that emissions converge more rapidly for NAFTA than for EU-27 and Euro-Med countries. We find consistent evidence that only RTAs with environmental harmonization policies affect relative and absolute pollution levels. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 390
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   The trade structure effects of endogenous regional trade agreements [J].
Egger, Hartmut ;
Egger, Peter ;
Greenaway, David .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 74 (02) :278-298
[22]   Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality [J].
Frankel, JA ;
Rose, AK .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2005, 87 (01) :85-91
[23]   Does trade cause growth? [J].
Frankel, JA ;
Romer, D .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :379-399
[24]  
Grossman Gene., 1991, NBER Working Paper Series
[25]  
Heckman J.J., 1999, Handbook of Labor Economics, VIII.
[26]   Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme [J].
Heckman, JJ ;
Ichimura, H ;
Todd, PE .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1997, 64 (04) :605-654
[27]  
Kuznets S, 1955, AM ECON REV, V45, P1
[28]   Does trade openness improve environmental quality? [J].
Managi, Shunsuke ;
Hibiki, Akira ;
Tsurumi, Tetsuya .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 58 (03) :346-363
[29]   The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: Evidence from developing countries [J].
Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada ;
Maruotti, Antonello .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (07) :1344-1353
[30]   TOWARD A NEW CONCEPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT-COMPETITIVENESS RELATIONSHIP [J].
PORTER, ME ;
VANDERLINDE, C .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (04) :97-118