区域水资源三条红线的动态刻画与综合评价方法(英文)

被引:4
作者
臧正 [1 ]
邹欣庆 [1 ,2 ,3 ]
奚旭 [4 ]
张雨 [4 ]
郑德凤 [4 ]
孙才志 [4 ]
机构
[1] School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences,Nanjing University
[2] Collaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies
[3] Key Laboratory of Coastal and Island Development (Nanjing University),Ministry of Education
[4] School of Urban Planning and Environmental Science,Liaoning Normal University
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TV213.4 [水利资源的管理、保护与改造];
学科分类号
082802 ;
摘要
Based on the synergetic development of new industrialization, rapid urbanization and agricultural modernization(IUAM), and from the viewpoint of interactive relationships between water resources and regional population, eco-environment, economy and society, the concepts of water resources intensity(WRI), water environment intensity(WEI), water resources relative efficiency(WRRE) and water environment relative efficiency(WERE) are defined with reference to energy intensity, resources efficiency and environment efficiency theory. On the basis of benchmarking theory, the quantitative characterization and evaluation method of "Three Red Lines"(the upper limit of water resources allocation, the baseline of utilization efficiency of water resources and the upper limit of sewage discharge) is proposed. According to these concepts and models, an empirical analysis of the Three Red Lines of water resources on the Chinese mainland between 2003 and 2012 was carried out. The results showed that total water consumption in eastern, central and western parts of China possesses "club convergence" characteristics, which means these areas have similar internal conditions appeared convergence in the development. Inter-provincial differences in water consumption continue to decrease, but the north–south differentiation characteristics in the eastern and central regions were still relatively obvious, while provincial differences in the eastern part were at a minimum and the central region had the largest. Water Resources Efficiency(WRE) of all four sectors in the Southwest rivers and Huaihe River basins were generally high. Industrial WRRE in the Songhua River, Yangtze River and Pearl River basins, agricultural WRRE in the Songhua River, Yellow River and northwestern river basins and domestic WRRE in the Liaohe River, Yangtze River and Pearl River basins were all low. Eco-environmental WRRE in the southeastern rivers and Yangtze River basins were low but showed an upward trend. Other river basins, except for the Northwestern rivers basin, had high eco-environmental WRRE with a downward trend. Western China, especially the northwestern part,had a low relative intensity of the water environment(WERI) and high integrated water environment management(IWEM) performance, but the relative intensities of the water resources(WRRI) were fairly high, and the comprehensive performance of integrated water resources management(IWRM) in these regions was low. In southern China, especially the southeastern part, the IWEM was fairly high, but the overall IWRM was lower.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 414
页数:18
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   中国城镇化对经济增长及用水变化的驱动效应——基于省级行政区1997-2011年数据的分析(英文) [J].
鲍超 ;
陈小杰 .
Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015, 25 (05) :530-544
[2]   中国水资源利用效率与空间溢出效应测度(英文) [J].
孙才志 ;
赵良仕 ;
邹玮 ;
郑德凤 .
JournalofGeographicalSciences, 2014, 24 (05) :771-788
[3]   基于面板VAR模型的新疆农业用水与农业经济增长的互动效应研究 [J].
李青 ;
陈红梅 ;
王雅鹏 .
资源科学, 2014, 36 (08) :1679-1685
[4]   塔里木河流域绿洲城镇发展与水土资源效益分析(英文) [J].
杨宇 ;
刘毅 .
Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24 (03) :509-525
[5]   北京市水资源管理“三条红线”指标体系与评价方法 [J].
刘晓 ;
刘虹利 ;
王红瑞 ;
俞淞 ;
马东春 .
自然资源学报, 2014, 29 (06) :1017-1028
[6]   河北平原冬小麦播种面积收缩对农业水资源消耗的影响(英文) [J].
王学 ;
李秀彬 ;
辛良杰 .
Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24 (02) :313-330
[7]   改进的生态系统服务价值模型及其在生态经济评价中的应用 [J].
郑德凤 ;
臧正 ;
孙才志 .
资源科学, 2014, 36 (03) :584-593
[8]   中国北方地区用水进入低增长和微增长阶段的必要性和可能性 [J].
陆大道 ;
贾绍凤 ;
白永平 .
地理研究, 2014, 33 (02) :203-213
[9]   区域最严格水资源管理“三条红线”评价指标体系的构建 [J].
杨丹 ;
张昊 ;
管西柯 ;
李玲 ;
李广杰 ;
林洪孝 .
水电能源科学, 2013, 31 (12) :182-185
[10]   基于人水和谐和“三条红线”的水资源配置研究 [J].
梁士奎 ;
左其亭 .
水利水电技术, 2013, 44 (07) :1-4