生态退耕对中国农田生产力的影响(英文)

被引：8

作者：

秦元伟 ^{[1
,2
]}

闫慧敏 ^{[1
]}

刘纪远 ^{[1
]}

董金玮 ^{[3
]}

陈静清 ^{[1
]}

肖向明 ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS

[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

[3] Departments of Microbiology and Plant Botany,Center for Spatial Analysis,University of Oklahoma

来源：

JournalofGeographicalSciences | 2013年 / 23卷 / 03期

关键词：

ecological restoration; agricultural productivity; remote sensing; Grain for Green; Reclaimed Cropland to Lake;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F301.24 [土地开发与利用]; F205 [资源、环境和生态管理];

学科分类号：

083306 ; 0903 ; 120405 ; 020106 ;

摘要：

The changes in cropland quantity and quality due to land use are critical concerns to national food security, particularly for China. Despite the significant ecological effects, the ecological restoration program (ERP), started from 1999, has evidently altered the spatial patterns of China's cropland and agricultural productivity. Based on cropland dynamic data from 2000 to 2008 primarily derived from satellite images with a 30-m resolution and satellite-based net primary productivity models, we identified the impacts on agricultural productivity caused by ERP, including "Grain for Green" Program (GFGP) and "Reclaimed Cropland to Lake" (RCTL) Program. Our results indicated that the agricultural productivity lost with a rate of 132.67×104 t/a due to ERP, which accounted for 44.01% of the total loss rate caused by land use changes during 2000-2005. During 2005-2008, the loss rate due to ERP decreased to 77.18×104 t/a, which was equivalent to 58.17% of that in the first five years and 30.22% of the total loss rate caused by land use changes. The agricultural productivity loss from 2000-2008 caused by ERP was more attributed to GFGP (about 70%) than RCTL. Although ERP had a certain influence on cropland productivity during 2000-2008, its effect was still much less than that of urbanization; moreover, ERP was already converted from the project implementation phase to the consolidation phase.

引用

页码：404 / 416

页数：13

共 17 条

[1] 城市化和退耕还林草对中国耕地生产力的影响 [J].

闫慧敏 ;

刘纪远 ;

黄河清 ;

董金玮 ;

徐新良 ;

王军邦 .

地理学报, 2012, 67 (05) :579-588

[2] 黄土丘陵区生态建设效应与农户响应 [J].

吕昌河 ;

王茜 ;

马俊飞 .

干旱区资源与环境 , 2011, (10) :28-31

[3]

Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century[J]. LIU Jiyuan1, ZHANG Zengxiang2, XU Xinliang1, KUANG Wenhui1, ZHOU Wancun3, ZHANG Shuwen4, LI Rendong5, YAN Changzhen6, YU Dongsheng7, WU Shixin8, JIANG Nan91. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;2. Institute of Remote Sensing Applications, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;3. Chengdu Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS, Chengdu 610041, C

[4] 中国退耕还林(草)驱动力的多尺度分析 [J].

黄淑玲 ;

周洪建 ;

王静爱 ;

王圆圆 .

干旱区资源与环境 , 2010, (04) :112-116

[5] 中国农田生产力变化的空间格局及地形控制作用 [J].

闫慧敏 ;

刘纪远 ;

曹明奎 .

地理学报, 2007, (02) :171-180

[6]

Effect of Vegetation Changes on Soil Erosion on the Loess Plateau[J]. ZHENG Fen-Li State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming in Loess Plateau, Northwest A＆F University, Yangling 712100 (China)..Pedosphere. 2006(04)

[7] 三江平原湿地保护与耕地开垦冲突权衡 [J].

李云成 ;

刘昌明 ;

于静洁 .

北京林业大学学报, 2006, (01) :39-42

[8] 中国耕地变化及其对生物生产力的影响———兼谈中国的粮食安全 [J].

邓祥征 ;

黄季焜 ;

Scott Rozelle .

中国软科学, 2005, (05) :65-70

[9] 退耕还林:成本有效性、结构调整效应与经济可持续性——基于西部三省农户调查的实证分析 [J].

徐晋涛 ;

陶然 ;

徐志刚 .

经济学(季刊), 2004, (04) :139-162

[10] 1990～2000年中国土壤碳氮蓄积量与土地利用变化 [J].

刘纪远 ;

王绍强 ;

陈镜明 ;

刘明亮 ;

庄大方 .

地理学报, 2004, (04) :483-496

← 1 2 →