我国环境污染信息披露的主体选择与社会效率

被引：5

作者：

崔亚飞 ^{[1
]}

宋马林 ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] 安徽财经大学财政与公共管理学院

[2] 不详

来源：

财经研究 | 2012年 / 38卷 / 07期

关键词：

信息不对称; 污染信息披露; 社会效率;

D O I：

10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2012.07.004

中图分类号：

X321 [区域环境规划与管理];

学科分类号：

083305 ; 1204 ;

摘要：

环境污染信息披露作为环境管制措施已受到我国政府高度重视。由污染者还是第三方负责环境污染信息披露,其社会效率存在重要差异。文章利用污染者与受污者之间信息不对称的行为选择模型,基于污染者付费原则的环境污染信息披露社会效率研究表明:少数情况下由污染者负责环境污染信息披露可以将污染外部性内在化,但大多数情况下只有第三方负责环境污染信息披露才具有社会效率。

引用

页码：59 / 67

页数：9

共 17 条

[11]

Strategic environmental disclosure: Evidence from the DOE's voluntary greenhouse gas registry[J] . Eun-Hee Kim,Thomas P. Lyon.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management . 2011 (3)

[12]

The impacts of the “right to know”: Information disclosure and the violation of drinking water standards[J] . Lori S. Bennear,Sheila M. Olmstead.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management . 2008 (2)

[13]

Information Disclosure as Environmental Regulation: A Theoretical Analysis[J] . Mark A. Cohen,V. Santhakumar.Environmental and Resource Economics . 2007 (3)

[14]

The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note[J] . Dennis M. Patten.Accounting, Organizations and Society . 2002 (8)

[15] The polluter pays versus the pollutee pays principle under asymmetric information [J].

Huber, C ;

Wirl, F .

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 35 (01) :69-87

[16] Disclosure Strategies for Pollution Control [J].

Tom Tietenberg .

Environmental and Resource Economics, 1998, 11 :587-602

[17]

Information As Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions[J] . Shameek Konar,Mark A. Cohen.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management . 1997 (1)

← 1 2 →