多因型抗争:对邻避运动肇因的多维审视——以R市反核电站建设运动为例(1983—2015年)

被引:7
作者
王刚
宋锴业
机构
[1] 中国海洋大学法政学院
关键词
环境风险; 邻避运动; 诉权—感知—谋利; 多因型抗争; 差序政府信任;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D630 [国家机关工作与人事管理];
学科分类号
摘要
已有的邻避运动肇因研究,一直遵循"诉权—感知—谋利"的解释框架。通过对R市邻避运动的实证分析,可以发现邻避运动的产生至少包括身份特质型动因、风险机会型动因与媒介建构型动因三个维度。对比传统解释框架可以发现,无论诉权、感知还是谋利,都不是邻避运动产生的核心肇因。相反,高动员特质、较低的抗争风险、新媒介的助推更易导致抗争行为。鉴于此,"多因型抗争"的解释框架应包含身份特质、风险机会、媒介建构等三个肇因维度。相比于传统解释框架,多因型抗争对中国国情的环境抗争具有更强的解释力。进一步研究发现,"差序政府信任"是形塑中国邻避多因抗争行为的深层机制。它既引发民众进行邻避抗争,也规范民众在有限范围内有序地抗争。
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 126
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [11] NIMBY syndrome and public consultation policy: the implications of a discourse analysis of local responses to the establishment of a community mental health facility[J] . Cowan Sue.Health & social care in the community . 2003 (5)
  • [12] Taxation without Representation: Peasants, the Central and the Local States in Reform China[J] . Thomas P. Bernstein,Xiaobo Lü.The China Quarterly . 2000
  • [13] FROM MEDIA POLITICS TO E-PROTEST[J] . Alan Scott,John Street.Information, Communication & Society . 2000 (2)
  • [14] Factors contributing to NIMBY attitudes[J] . Vittes M.E.,Pollock P.H.,Lilie S.A..Waste Management . 1993 (2)
  • [15] NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the Syndromes[J] . William R. Freudenburg,Susan K. Pastor.Journal of Social Issues . 1992 (4)
  • [16] Moral Considerations and Public Policy Choices: Individual Autonomy and the Nimby Problem[J] . John Martin Gillroy.Public Affairs Quarterly . 1991 (4)
  • [17] Citizen Participation and the Nimby Syndrome: Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal[J] . Kraft Michael E.,Clary Bruce B..The Western Political Quarterly . 1991 (2)
  • [19] Property Rights, Protest, and the Siting of Hazardous Waste Facilities[J] . Robert Cameron Mitchell,Richard T. Carson.The American Economic Review . 1986 (2)
  • [20] Public acceptability of California's wind energy developments: Three studies .2 Bosley,P,Bosley,K. Wind Engineering . 1988