制造业、生产性服务业协同集聚与城市经济效率——基于“本地-邻地”效应的视角

被引:15
作者
张明斗 [1 ]
王亚男 [2 ]
机构
[1] 东北财经大学经济学院
[2] 不详
关键词
协同集聚; 城市经济效率“; 本地-邻地”效应; 空间异质性; 动态空间杜宾模型;
D O I
10.13781/j.cnki.1007-9556.2021.06.002
中图分类号
F424 [工业建设与发展]; F719 [服务业]; F299.2 [中国];
学科分类号
摘要
以中国262个地级及以上城市为研究样本,基于"本地-邻地"效应的视角,实证分析了制造业与生产性服务业协同集聚对城市经济效率的影响。研究显示:制造业与生产性服务业协同集聚对本地城市经济效率的影响呈现倒U型,对邻地城市经济效率的影响呈现U型;短期内制造业与生产性服务业协同集聚对"本地-邻地"城市经济效率的影响呈现U型,长期则表现为倒U型;制造业与生产性服务业协同集聚对"本地-邻地"城市经济效率的短期效应与长期效应存在空间异质性。
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 28
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] Assessing the Localization Pattern of German Manufacturing and Service Industries: A Distance-based Approach[J] . Hyun-Ju Koh,Nadine Riedel.Regional Studies . 2014 (5)
  • [12] Interpreting dynamic space-time panel data models
    Debarsy, Nicolas
    Ertur, Cem
    LeSage, James P.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2012, 9 (1-2) : 158 - 171
  • [13] Dynamic spatial panels: models, methods, and inferences[J] . J. Paul Elhorst.Journal of Geographical Systems . 2012 (1)
  • [14] A SPATIAL DYNAMIC PANEL DATA MODEL WITH BOTH TIME AND INDIVIDUAL FIXED EFFECTS
    Lee, Lung-Fei
    Yu, Jihai
    [J]. ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2010, 26 (02) : 564 - 597
  • [15] Sectoral agglomeration economies in a panel of European regions
    Bruelhart, Marius
    Mathys, Nicole A.
    [J]. REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2008, 38 (04) : 348 - 362
  • [16] Producer Service Linkages and Industrial Innovation: Results of a Twelve‐Year Tracking Study of New York State Manufacturers[J] . ALAN MACPHERSON.Growth and Change . 2008 (1)
  • [17] Market Size, Trade, and Productivity[J] . Melitz Marc J.,Giancarlo I. P. Ottaviano.The Review of Economic Studies . 2008 (1)
  • [18] THE GERMAN SERVICE GAP OR: RE‐ORGANISING THE MANUFACTURING––SERVICES PUZZLE[J] . BrigittePreissl.Metroeconomica . 2007 (3)
  • [19] Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: spatial selection and sorting[J] . Journal of Economic Geography . 2006 (3)
  • [20] Where do firms locate? Testing competing models of agglomeration
    LaFountain, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2005, 58 (02) : 338 - 366