高校创新创业教育政策扩散的影响因素研究——以中国“双一流”A类高校为例

被引:11
作者
康晓玲
李朝阳
刘京
张霞
机构
[1] 西安电子科技大学经济与管理学院
关键词
高校; 创新创业教育; 政策扩散; 影响因素;
D O I
10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2021.10.06
中图分类号
G647.38 [];
学科分类号
摘要
以中国30所"双一流"A类高校2015~2018年间的政策响应为例,实证分析了高校创新创业教育政策扩散的影响因素。结果表明:校长任期、学科特色与省(市)内其他高校响应程度对高校的政策响应程度具有显著影响。这意味着实现高校校长适度流动,培育创新创业教研人才,构建校际协同育人机制有助于高校创新创业教育政策响应程度的提高。
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 43
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [11] Policy Infusion Through Capacity Building and Project Interaction: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in China[J] . Katja Biedenkopf,Sarah Van Eynde,Hayley Walker.Global Environmental Politics . 2017 (3)
  • [12] Social Networks and Policy Entrepreneurship: How Relationships Shape Municipal Decision Making about High‐Volume Hydraulic Fracturing[J] . Gwen Arnold,Le Anh Nguyen Long,Madeline Gottlieb.Policy Studies Journal . 2017 (3)
  • [13] Response to Kurt Weyland’s review of Diffusion of Democracy: The Past and Future of Global Democracy[J] . Wejnert Barbara.Perspectives on Politics . 2015 (2)
  • [14] Street-level policy entrepreneurship
    Arnold, Gwen
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 17 (03) : 307 - 327
  • [15] Policy Innovativeness and Interstate Compacts
    Nicholson-Crotty, Sean C.
    Woods, Neal D.
    Bowman, Ann O'M.
    Karch, Andrew
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2014, 42 (02) : 305 - 324
  • [16] Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance
    Hambrick, Donald C.
    Quigley, Timothy J.
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (04) : 473 - 491
  • [17] INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL ANTECEDENTS OF PROCESS INNOVATION[J] . Richard M. Walker.Public management review . 2014 (1)
  • [18] The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science[J] . British Journal of Political Science . 2013 (3)
  • [19] Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion: going beyond the prevailing binarity[J] . Felix Strebel,Thomas Widmer.Policy Sciences . 2012 (4)
  • [20] Approaches to Modeling the Adoption and Diffusion of Policies with Multiple Components
    Boehmke, Frederick J.
    [J]. STATE POLITICS & POLICY QUARTERLY, 2009, 9 (02) : 229 - 252