从“理性vs非(反)理性”到“反思vs自反” 社会理论中现代性诊断范式的流变

被引：24

作者：

肖瑛

机构：

[1] 湘潭大学副教授法学(社会学)博士

来源：

社会 | 2005年 / 02期

关键词：

social theory; instrumental rationality; modernity; reflexivity; risk society;

D O I：

10.15992/j.cnki.31-1123/c.2005.02.001

中图分类号：

C912 [社会结构和社会关系];

学科分类号：

1407 ;

摘要：

In the history of social theory, there are three paradigms of diagnosing the difficulties of modernity: rationalism, historicism and postmodernism. All above paradigms think that it is the conflictive relation of rationality and non-rationality or anti-rationality results in all difficulties of modernity, so they can be reduced to a general paradigm: rationality vs un-rationality or anti-rationality. At the end of 20 th century, some social theorists put forward a new paradigm: reflection vs self-refutation. From the paradigm, we can discover that paradox is inherent of rationality and it is this paradox that makes rationality be the creator of modernity on the one hand and be the cause of modern risk society on the other hand.

引用

页码：1 / 24

页数：24

共 18 条

[11] 人类精神进步史表纲要.[M].(法)孔多塞(Condorcet)著;何兆武;何冰译;.三联书店.1998,
[12] 社会的构成.[M].(英)安东尼·吉登斯(AnthonyGiddens)著;李康;李猛译;.三联书店.1998,
[13] 后现代主义与社会科学.[M].(美)波林·罗斯诺(PaulineMarieRosenau)著;张国清译;.上海译文出版社.1998,
[14] 单向度的人.[M].(美)马尔库塞(Marcuse;H.)著;刘　继译;.上海译文出版社.1989,
[15] 理性化及其限制.[M].苏国勋著;.上海人民出版社.1988,
[16] 启蒙哲学.[M].(德)卡西勒著;顾伟铭等译;.山东人民出版社.1988,
[17] 新教伦理与资本主义精神.[M].(德)韦　伯(Weber;M.)著;于　晓;陈维纲译;.三联书店.1987,
[18] 猜想与反驳.[M].(英)波普尔(K.R.Popper)著;傅季重等译;.上海译文出版社.1986,

← 1 2 →