稻鸭、稻鱼共作生态系统CH4和N2O温室效应及经济效益评估

被引:58
作者
袁伟玲
曹凑贵
李成芳
展茗
蔡明历
汪金平
机构
[1] 华中农业大学作物栽培与生理生态研究中心
关键词
CH4排放; N2O排放; 稻鸭共作; 稻鱼共作; 温室效应; 经济效益;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S511 [稻]; S834 [鸭]; S964 [淡水鱼养殖方式]; S181 [农业生态学];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
【目的】稻鸭、稻鱼共作生态系统是中国南方稻作区两种主要复合种养模式。研究稻鸭、稻鱼共作生态系统中CH4和N2O排放产生的温室效应并对其经济价值进行评价,旨在为进一步开发利用稻田综合利用模式提供理论基础和实践依据。【方法】采用静态箱技术,研究稻鸭、稻鱼共作生态系统CH4和N2O排放规律,并运用增温潜势对稻鸭、稻鱼共作生态系统CH4和N2O排放的温室效应及经济效益进行估算。【结果】在水稻生长期间,稻鸭、稻鱼共作系统中CH4排放峰值均出现在分蘖盛期和抽穗期,其平均排放通量均显著(P<0.05)低于常规淹水稻田;N2O的排放通量在稻田淹水期间保持较低值,而在稻田落干后迅速升高。养鸭显著(P<0.05)提高了稻田N2O的排放,养鱼降低了稻田N2O的排放。2006和2007年稻鸭、稻鱼处理CH4和N2O排放产生总温室效应分别为4728.3、4611.0kgCO2·hm-2和4545.0、4754.3kgCO2·hm-2,其温室效应成本分别为970.89、946.81 yuan/hm2和933.25和976.23 yuan/hm2,明显低于CK的5997.6和5391.5 yuan/hm2。除去CH4和N2O排放产生温室效应的环境成本,采用稻鸭、稻鱼生态种养技术的经济效益分别比常规稻田增加2210.64、4881.92yuan/hm2和3798.37、5310.64 yuan/hm2。【结论】稻鸭、稻鱼共作能有效的抑制稻田温室气体排放并显著降低其温室效应。因此,稻鸭、稻鱼共作是减少温室气体排放的有效措施之一,具有较好的推广价值。
引用
收藏
页码:2052 / 2060
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] A3-year field measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in China:effects of water regime,crop residue,and fertilizer application. Zou J,Huang Y,Jiang J,Zheng X,Sass R L. Global Biogeochemical Cycles . 2005
  • [22] Automated chambe measurement of methane and nitrous oxide flux in a flooded rice soil I.Residue,nitrogen,and water management. Bronson K F,Neue H U,Singh U,Abao E B. Soil Science Society o America Journal . 1997
  • [23] Environmental Indicators for Agriculture: Methods and Results. OECD. . 2000
  • [24] Integrated rice-fish production and methane emission under greenhouse conditions Agriculture. FREI M,BECKER K. Eco-systems and Environment . 2005
  • [25] Global warming potential of manure amended soils under rice-wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Bhatia, A,Pathak, H.,Jain, N. et al. Atmospheric Environment . 2005
  • [26] Methane emission characteristics and its relations with plant and soil parameters under irrigated rice ecosystem of northeast India. N Gogoi,KK Baruah,B Gogoi,PK Gupta. Chemosphere . 2005
  • [27] Fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide in water-saving rice production in north China. Kreye C,Dittert K,Zheng XH,Zhang X,Lin S,Ta HB,Sattelmacher B. Nutri Cycl Agroecosyst . 2007
  • [28] Characteristics of methane emission from wetland rice–duck complex ecosystem. Huang,Y,Wang,H,Huang,H,Feng,ZW,Yang,ZH,Luo,YC. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment . 2005
  • [29] Modeling impacts of farming management alternatives on CO2,CH4,and N2O emissions:A case study for water management of rice agriculture of China. Li C S,Frolking S,Xiao X M,Moore III B,Boles S,Qiu J J,Huang Y,Salas W,Sass R. Global Biogeochemical Cycles . 2005
  • [30] Fluxes of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide from experimental excreta patches in boreal agricultural soil. Maljanen,Martikkala,Koponen HT,Virkajarvi P,Martikainen PJ. Soil Biology and Biochemisty . 2007