数字鸿沟与学生学业水平——以PISA 2012上海地区的调查数据为例

被引:11
作者
程千里
张炜华
机构
[1] 复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院社会学系
关键词
互联网; 学业水平; 倾向值; 数字鸿沟;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G639.2 [中国];
学科分类号
摘要
PISA测试2012年的数据表明,在使用倾向值匹配以排除家庭经济地位等诸多背景因素的影响后,互联网仍对上海中学生的学业水平有显著的积极影响。学生首次接触互联网的年龄越早,学生的学业水平发展就越好;而学生首次接触互联网的年龄又与背景因素显著相关;这表明互联网同时也拉开了学业水平的差异,数字鸿沟在持续产生影响。互联网对不平等的再生产论得以证实,但仍不可忽视互联网的积极作用。
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 56
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Too much computer and Internet use is bad for your grades, especially if you are young and poor: Results from the 2001 Brazilian SAEB[J] .  &nbspComputers & Education . 2008 (4)
  • [2] Increasing inequalities in what we do online: A longitudinal cross sectional analysis of Internet activities among the Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income[J] . Alexander J.A.M. van Deursen,Jan A.G.M. van Dijk,Peter M. ten Klooster. &nbspTelematics and Informatics . 2015 (2)
  • [3] An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia[J] . King Luu,John G. Freeman. &nbspComputers & Education . 2010 (4)
  • [4] Measuring ICT Use and Learning Outcomes: evidence from recent econometric studies[J] . Federico Biagi,Massimo Loi. &nbspEuropean Journal of Education . 2013 (1)
  • [5] The association between having access to computers and Internet and educational achievement for primary students in Brazil[J] . Jacques Wainer,Paula Vieira,Tatiana Melguizo. &nbspComputers & Education . 2015
  • [6] 倾向值分析[M]. 重庆大学出版社 , (美) 郭申阳, 2012
  • [7] 是什么导致了对PISA结果的误读[N]. 张民选. &nbsp文汇报. 2013 (005)
  • [9] “数字鸿沟”:当代社会阶层分析的新视角
    李升
    [J]. 社会, 2006, (06) : 81 - 94+210
  • [10] 倾向值匹配与因果推论:方法论述评
    胡安宁
    [J]. 社会学研究, 2012, 27 (01) : 221 - 242+246