开放式创新网络中的价值独占机制:打开“开放性”和“与狼共舞”悖论

被引:82
作者
应瑛 [1 ]
刘洋 [2 ]
魏江 [2 ]
机构
[1] 浙江财经大学工商管理学院
[2] 浙江大学管理学院
基金
浙江省自然科学基金;
关键词
开放式创新; 创新网络; 创新追赶; 创新独占; 案例研究;
D O I
10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2018.02.013
中图分类号
F273.1 [企业技术管理];
学科分类号
摘要
技术和市场能力相对落后的后发企业在构建全球创新网络过程中不可避免地会遇到两个悖论:权衡开放度(Openness)来获取知识的同时避免知识外泄这一"开放性"悖论;必须与国际领先企业建立连带以获取知识且避免被其破坏自身价值获取的"与狼共舞"悖论。为了解决这两个悖论,本文基于归纳式的案例研究方法,构建了"后发企业从开放式创新网络中价值独占"的理论框架。本文发现,探索式创新网络战略主要通过主导范式设计与因果模糊机制作用于国内市场的价值独占,利用式创新网络战略主要通过因果模糊机制与互补性资产机制作用于国际市场的价值独占。这些结论对开放式创新理论和后发企业追赶理论均有一定贡献,也对中国后发企业有一定启示意义。
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 160+188 +188
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] PROCESS STUDIES OF CHANGE IN ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT: UNVEILING TEMPORALITY, ACTIVITY, AND FLOW[J] . The Academy of Management Journal . 2013 (1)
  • [32] Appropriating the value from innovation: inimitability and the effectiveness of isolating mechanisms[J] . Benn Lawson,Danny Samson,Sinéad Roden.R&D Manage . 2012 (5)
  • [33] Local R&D Strategies and Multilocation Firms: The Role of Internal Linkages[J] . Juan Alcácer,Minyuan Zhao.Management Science . 2012 (4)
  • [34] Are all sharks' dangerous? new biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D alliances
    Diestre, Luis
    Rajagopalan, Nandini
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (10) : 1115 - 1134
  • [35] Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions[J] . Academy of Management Perspectives . 2011 (1)
  • [36] How open is innovation?
    Dahlander, Linus
    Gann, David M.
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (06) : 699 - 709
  • [37] Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives[J] . Eelko K.R.E. Huizingh.Technovation . 2010 (1)
  • [38] Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon[J] . Ellen Enkel,Oliver Gassmann,Henry Chesbrough.R&D Management . 2009 (4)
  • [39] Networking as a Means to Strategy Change: The Case of Open Innovation in Mobile Telephony[J] . Koen Dittrich,Geert Duysters.Journal of Product Innovation Management . 2007 (6)
  • [40] Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation"
    Teece, David J.
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (08) : 1131 - 1146