中国农村与发展的制度分析:以浙江省湖州市为例

被引:8
作者
李文钊
谭沂丹
毛寿龙
机构
[1] 中国人民大学公共管理学院
关键词
中国农村; 发展; 制度分析; 比较研究;
D O I
10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2011.10.004
中图分类号
F327 [地方农业经济];
学科分类号
020202 ;
摘要
农村与发展是一个世界性难题。2006年,中共十六届五中全会,提出新农村建设的"二十字方针",为中国农村发展刻画了美好蓝图。但是,整体而言,中国农村发展仍然是一种"问题应对型"发展,即根据农村当前发展所面对的挑战和问题,制定有关"权宜之计",缺乏系统性思考和整体性策略。本文根据对浙江省湖州市农村改革实践的实地调研,以及对发展理论演进的文献分析,试图从制度分析的角度开发一个农村与发展的分析框架,强调物质、制度和文化对于农村发展的意蕴,并提出一个"以知识促进发展,以服务保障发展,以市场激活发展,以制度持续发展,以合作带动发展"的理论模型。对于这一模型的内部效度检验,主要是用这一理论模型对浙江省湖州市的实践进行总结和分析。而对这一模型的外部效度检验,我们将从世界的角度看待这一模型,将世界的国家划分为四种类型,即传统农业国、转型中国家、城市化国家和发达国家,探讨这一模型对于不同类型国家的适用性。
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 47+187 +187-188
页数:18
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Control–trust interplays and the influence paradox: A comparative study of MNC-subsidiary relationships.[J]..Industrial Marketing Management.2009, 5
[2]   Friendship versus business in marketing relationships [J].
Grayson, Kent .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2007, 71 (04) :121-139
[3]   Feeling trusted by business leaders in China: Antecedents and the mediating role of value congruence [J].
Lau D.C. ;
Liu J. ;
Fu P.P. .
Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2007, 24 (3) :321-340
[4]   Interfirm monitoring, social contracts, and relationship outcomes [J].
Heide, Jan B. ;
Wathne, Kenneth H. ;
Rokkan, Aksel I. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2007, 44 (03) :425-433
[5]   Friends, businesspeople, and relationship roles: A conceptual framework and a research agenda [J].
Heide, Jan B. ;
Wathne, Kenneth H. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2006, 70 (03) :90-103
[6]   Trust building among strangers [J].
Ho, TH ;
Weigelt, K .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (04) :519-530
[7]  
Unilateral control and the moderating effects of fairness on the target's performance in asymmetric channel partnerships.[J].Miguel Hernández-Espallardo;Narciso Arcas-Lario.European Journal of Marketing.2003, 11
[8]   When does trust matter? Antecedents and contingent effects of supervisee trust on performance in selling new products in China and the United States [J].
Atuahene-Gima, K ;
Li, HY .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2002, 66 (03) :61-81
[9]   Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability [J].
Brockner, J .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (01) :58-76
[10]  
Business Friends: Aristotle; Kant and Other Management Theorists on the Practice of Networking.[J].Jonathan Schonsheck.Business Ethics Quarterly.2000, 4