Trust building among strangers

被引:47
作者
Ho, TH [1 ]
Weigelt, K
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
trust building; backward induction; behavioral game theory;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1040.0350
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The trust-building process is basic to social science. We investigate it in a laboratory setting using a novel multistage trust game where social gains are achieved if players trust each other in each stage. In each stage, also, players have an opportunity to appropriate these gains or be trustworthy by sharing them. Players are strangers because they do not know the identity of others and, they will not play them again. Thus, there is no prospect of future interaction to induce trusting behavior, and, we study the trust-building process where there is little scope for social relations and networks. Standard game theory, which assumes all players are opportunistic and untrustworthy and thus should have zero trust for others, is used to construct a null hypothesis. We test whether people are trusting or trustworthy and examine how inferring the intentions of those who trust affects trustworthiness. We also investigate the effect of stake on trust, and study the evolution of trust. Results show subjects exhibit some degree of trusting behavior, although a majority of them are not trustworthy and claim the entire social gain. Players are more reluctant to trust in later stages than in earlier ones and are more trustworthy if they are certain of the trustee's intention. Surprisingly, subjects are more trusting and trustworthy when the stake size increases. Finally, we find the subpopulation that invests in initiating the trust-building process modifies its trusting behavior based on the relative fitness of trust.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 530
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1973, J ECON HIST, V33, P16, DOI 10.1017/S0022050700076403
[2]  
Axelrod R, 2006, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
[3]   TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY [J].
BERG, J ;
DICKHAUT, J ;
MCCABE, K .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) :122-142
[4]   PRICE, AUTHORITY, AND TRUST - FROM IDEAL TYPES TO PLURAL FORMS [J].
BRADACH, JL ;
ECCLES, RG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1989, 15 :97-118
[5]   Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games [J].
Camerer, C ;
Ho, TH .
ECONOMETRICA, 1999, 67 (04) :827-874
[6]   EXPERIMENTAL TESTS OF A SEQUENTIAL EQUILIBRIUM REPUTATION MODEL [J].
CAMERER, C ;
WEIGELT, K .
ECONOMETRICA, 1988, 56 (01) :1-36
[7]  
Camerer C. F., 2003, BEHAV GAME THEORY
[8]   The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework [J].
Camerer, CF ;
Hogarth, RM .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1999, 19 (1-3) :7-42
[9]   A cognitive hierarchy model of games [J].
Camerer, CF ;
Ho, TH ;
Chong, JK .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (03) :861-898
[10]   Sophisticated experience-weighted attraction learning and strategic teaching in repeated games [J].
Camerer, CF ;
Ho, TH ;
Chong, JK .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2002, 104 (01) :137-188