市场约束、政府干预与城市商业银行风险承担

被引:42
作者
曹廷求 [1 ,2 ]
张光利 [1 ]
机构
[1] 山东大学银行治理研究中心
[2] 山东大学经济学院金融系
关键词
城市商业银行; 银行风险; 市场约束; 政府干预; 公共治理环境;
D O I
10.16529/j.cnki.11-4613/f.2011.02.005
中图分类号
F832.33 [商业银行(专业银行)];
学科分类号
摘要
本文利用2001~2009年中国主要城市商业银行的财务数据,从价格机制和数量机制的角度分析市场约束的有效性,发现市场机制没有有效地约束银行风险,相反政府干预机制显著地增加了银行风险,在一定程度上政府干预机制替代了市场约束机制的作用。在制度环境差、政府干预强的地区,市场约束机制完全失效,而在制度环境好、政府干预相对较弱的地区,市场的价格约束机制显著地降低了银行的风险;风险程度和规模大小不同的银行所受的政府干预与市场约束效应不同。因此,为维持银行体系的稳定,在完善银行内部风险控制机制的同时,要不断完善外部公共治理环境。
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 14
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]  
Market discipline, disclosure and moral hazard in banking[J] . Erlend Nier,Ursel Baumann.Journal of Financial Intermediation . 2006 (3)
[12]   Market discipline and deposit insurance reform in Japan [J].
Imai, Masami .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2006, 30 (12) :3433-3452
[13]  
Politicians and banks: Political influences on government-owned banks in emerging markets[J] . Journal of Financial Economics . 2005 (2)
[14]   Government ownership of banks [J].
La Porta, R ;
Lopez-de-Silanes, F ;
Shleifer, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (01) :265-301
[15]   Does deposit insurance increase banking system stability?: An empirical investigation [J].
Demirgüç-Kunt, A ;
Detragiache, E .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2002, 49 (07) :1373-1406
[16]  
Market Discipline in the Governance of U.S. Bank Holding Companies: Monitoring vs. Influencing[J] . Robert R. Bliss,Mark J. Flannery.Review of Finance . 2002 (3)
[17]   Estimating the value of political connections [J].
Fisman, R .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :1095-1102
[18]   Why privatize? The case of Argentina's public provincial banks [J].
Clarke, GRG ;
Cull, R .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (05) :865-886
[19]  
Evidence of Bank Market Discipline in Subordinated Debenture Yields: 1983–1991[J] . MARK J. FLANNERY,SORIN M. SORESCU.The Journal of Finance . 1996 (4)
[20]  
Market discipline by depositors: Evidence from reduced-form equations[J] . Sangkyun Park.Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance . 1995