增值评价在美国教师评价中的运用和发展

被引：13

作者：

张雅楠

杜屏

机构：

[1] 北京师范大学教育学部

来源：

全球教育展望 | 2017年 / 46卷 / 01期

关键词：

教师增值评价; 多重评价; 教师课堂观察评价;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

G451 [教师];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0401 ;

摘要：

在教师效能评价中,增值评价法产生的偏误和不稳定性的弊端已经引起了较多学者的关注,美国教师评价模式的发展趋势已经由单一的增值法转变为包括教师课堂观察法在内的多重方法并行。本文首先讨论了增值法评价教师的优缺点,然后介绍了以教师课堂观察为基础的对教师效能评价方式的改进,其中以弗吉尼亚大学开发的课堂评估评分系统(简称CLASS)为例具体介绍课堂观察评估法的运用,最后总结出对我国教师评价方式改革的启示。

引用

页码：67 / 78+89 +89

页数：13

共 17 条

[1] 相对评价、增值评价与课堂观察评价的融合——美国教师评价的新趋势 [J].

胡咏梅 ;

施世珊 .

比较教育研究, 2014, 36 (08) :44-50

[2]

Teacher Quality at the High School Level: The Importance of Accounting for Tracks[J] . Journal of Labor Economics . 2014 (4)

[3]

Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates[J] . The American Economic Review . 2014 (9)

[4] WHERE YOU COME FROM OR WHERE YOU GO? DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN SCHOOL QUALITY AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHER PREPARATION PROGRAM GRADUATES [J].

Mihaly, Kata ;

McCaffrey, Daniel ;

Sass, Tim R. ;

Lockwood, J. R. .

EDUCATION FINANCE AND POLICY, 2013, 8 (04) :459-493

[5] Is it Just a Bad Class? Assessing the Long-term Stability of Estimated Teacher Performance [J].

Goldhaber, Dan ;

Hansen, Michael .

ECONOMICA, 2013, 80 (319) :589-612

[6]

Different Teachers, Different Peers[J] . Demetra Kalogrides,Susanna Loeb.Educational Researcher . 2013 (6)

[7]

Teacher Incentives and Student Achievement: Evidence from New York City Public Schools[J] . Journal of Labor Economics . 2013 (2)

[8]

The Distribution of Teacher Quality and Implications for Policy[J] . Eric A. Hanushek,Steven G. Rivkin.Annual Review of Economics . 2012

[9] DOES STUDENT SORTING INVALIDATE VALUE-ADDED MODELS OF TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS? AN EXTENDED ANALYSIS OF THE ROTHSTEIN CRITIQUE [J].

Koedel, Cory ;

Betts, Julian R. .

EDUCATION FINANCE AND POLICY, 2011, 6 (01) :18-42

[10]

Student Sorting and Bias in Value-Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables[J] . Jesse Rothstein.Education Finance and Policy . 2009 (4)

← 1 2 →