创新生态系统技术依存结构对企业集成创新竞争优势的影响研究

被引:24
作者
张利飞 [1 ]
吕晓思 [2 ]
张运生 [2 ]
机构
[1] 湖南大学经济与贸易学院
[2] 湖南大学工商管理学院
基金
湖南省自然科学基金;
关键词
创新生态系统; 技术依存结构; 竞争优势; 先动优势; 集成创新;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F273.1 [企业技术管理];
学科分类号
摘要
由分析技术依存结构对企业集成创新竞争优势的影响机理,发现在集成创新生态系统技术依存结构中,企业外部零组件、互补配套技术2种不同类型的技术体系,对本企业集成技术创新产生了明显的不对称性影响:外部零组件技术开发难度越大,越能增强集成创新技术领先者的研发竞争优势;外部互补配套技术开发难度越大,越能降低集成创新技术领先者的研发竞争优势;随着零组件与集成创新技术不确定性减弱,集成创新企业自主开发零组件技术比重越高,越能增强其研发竞争优势。
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 237
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] 需求诱致下的客户参与创新的激励研究
    张耀辉
    彭红兰
    [J]. 中国工业经济, 2010, (08) : 87 - 96
  • [2] 模块时代[M]. 上海远东出版社[日]青木昌彦[日]安藤晴彦编著, 2003
  • [3] Complementarity‐based hypercompetition in the software industry: Theory and empirical test, 1990–2002[J] . Chi‐HyonLee,N.Venkatraman,HüseyinTanriverdi,BalaIyer.Strat. Mgmt. J. . 2010 (13)
  • [4] Influences of supplier capabilities and collaboration in new car development on competitive advantage of carmakers[J] . Joongsan Oh,Seung-Kyu Rhee.Management Decision . 2010 (5)
  • [5] Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations[J] . RonAdner,RahulKapoor.Strat. Mgmt. J. . 2010 (3)
  • [6] SUPPLIER INNOVATIVENESS AND THE ROLE OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING IN ENHANCING MANUFACTURER CAPABILITIES
    Azadegan, Arash
    Dooley, Kevin J.
    Carter, Phillip L.
    Carter, Joseph R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2008, 44 (04) : 14 - 35
  • [7] Do modular products lead to modular organizations?
    Hoetker, Glenn
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (06) : 501 - 518
  • [8] Internal vs. external learning in new product development: effects on speed, costs and competitive advantage[J] . Eric H.Kessler,Paul E.Bierly,ShanthiGopalakrishnan.R&D Management . 2002 (3)
  • [9] The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization[J] . Paul Milgrom,John Roberts.The American Economic Review . 1990 (3)
  • [10] ASSET STOCK ACCUMULATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
    DIERICKX, I
    COOL, K
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (12) : 1504 - 1511