市场邻近、供给邻近与企业生产率

被引:15
作者
席强敏 [1 ]
孙瑞东 [2 ]
机构
[1] 中国人民大学应用经济学院
[2] 暨南大学经济学院
关键词
市场邻近; 供给邻近; “新”新经济地理;
D O I
10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2020.04.15
中图分类号
F425 [工业企业组织和经营管理];
学科分类号
020205 ; 0202 ;
摘要
新经济地理理论强调市场邻近和供给邻近带来的市场潜能提高将产生集聚效应,促进生产率的提高,"新"新经济地理理论则在考虑企业异质性后提出选择和类分效应的存在。本文证实了市场与供给邻近是影响企业生产率的重要因素,市场邻近带来的生产率优势略优于供给邻近;进一步识别出由市场和供给邻近带来的生产率优势来源于集聚、选择和类分效应,其中选择效应体现在更高的低效率企业淘汰风险,类分效应则体现在更多的高效率企业进入。
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 298
页数:22
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]  
Sources of productivity improvement in industrial clusters: The case of the prewar Japanese silk-reeling industry[J] . Yutaka Arimoto,Kentaro Nakajima,Tetsuji Okazaki.Regional Science and Urban Economics . 2014
[12]   Sorting and local wage and skill distributions in France [J].
Combes, Pierre-Philippe ;
Duranton, Gilles ;
Gobillon, Laurent ;
Roux, Sebastien .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2012, 42 (06) :913-930
[13]  
Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing[J] . Loren Brandt,Johannes Van Biesebroeck,Yifan Zhang.Journal of Development Economics . 2011 (2)
[14]  
Chapter 63 Econometric Tools for Analyzing Market Outcomes[J] . Daniel Ackerberg.Handbook of Econometrics . 2007
[15]  
Trade costs and location of foreign firms in China[J] . Mary Amiti,Beata Smarzynska Javorcik.Journal of Development Economics . 2006 (1)
[16]  
Market potential and productivity: Evidence from Finnish regions[J] . Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano,Dino Pinelli.Regional Science and Urban Economics . 2006 (5)
[17]   Regional wage and employment responses to market potential in the EU [J].
Head, Keith ;
Mayer, Thierry .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2006, 36 (05) :573-594
[18]  
A Fragmented China: Measure and Determinants of Chinese Domestic Market Disintegration[J] . SandraPoncet.Review of International Economics . 2005 (3)
[19]  
The theory of endowment, intra-industry and multi-national trade[J] . James R. Markusen,Anthony J. Venables.Journal of International Economics . 2000 (2)
[20]   INCREASING RETURNS AND ECONOMIC-GEOGRAPHY [J].
KRUGMAN, P .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1991, 99 (03) :483-499