认知融合问卷中文版的信效度分析

被引:121
作者
张维晨 [1 ,2 ]
吉阳 [1 ]
李新 [1 ]
郭慧娜 [1 ]
祝卓宏 [1 ]
机构
[1] 中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室
[2] 中国科学院大学
关键词
认知融合; 认知解离; 接纳与承诺疗法; 信度; 效度; 心理测量学研究;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B842.1 [认知];
学科分类号
摘要
目的:分析认知融合问卷(CFQ)中文版在一般人群中施测的信效度,为研究认知融合提供可靠有效的测量工具。方法:将CFQ译为中文版,包含13个条目。选取两个样本共1022位受试进行施测,样本1(n1=789)用于条目-总分相关系数分析和探索性因素分析,样本2(n2=233)用于验证性因素分析、效标效度和信度检验。用自评抑郁量表(SDS)、自评焦虑量表(SAS)来检验效标效度。间隔2周后,从样本2中随机选取82人进行重测。结果:条目-总分相关系数显示认知解离分问卷(CFQ-D)的4条目均<0.3,予以删除,仅保留认知融合分问卷(CFQ-F)的9条目。修订后探索性因素分析提取出1个因子,方差解释率为60.3%。验证性因素分析显示单因素模型拟合良好(χ2/df=2.01,NFI=0.97,IFI=0.99,CFI=0.99,RM SEA=0.06)。效标效度检验显示,CFQ-F与SDS和SAS得分均呈正相关(r=0.50、0.55,均P<0.01)。CFQ-F内部一致性系数为0.92,重测信度0.67。结论:认知融合问卷(CFQ)应只保留认知融合分问卷(CFQ-F)。CFQ-F中文版具有较好的信效度,可在我国用于认知融合相关研究。
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 44
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   接纳与承诺疗法的心理病理模型和治疗模式 [J].
张婍 ;
王淑娟 ;
祝卓宏 .
中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26 (05) :377-381
[2]   治疗情绪障碍的元认知疗法 [J].
关曦 ;
刘海燕 .
中国心理卫生杂志, 2007, (05) :356-358
[3]  
How ruminative thinking styles lead to dysfunctional cognitions: Evidence from a mediation model[J] . Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt,Rudi De Raedt.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry . 2012 (3)
[4]  
The Drexel defusion scale: A new measure of experiential distancing[J] . Evan M. Forman,James D. Herbert,Adrienne S. Juarascio,Peter D. Yeomans,John A. Zebell,Elizabeth M. Goetter,Ethan Moitra.Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science . 2012 (1-2)
[5]  
Depressive symptoms predict inflexibly high levels of experiential avoidance in response to daily negative affect: A daily diary study[J] . Ben Shahar,Nathaniel R. Herr.Behaviour Research and Therapy . 2011 (10)
[6]  
Open, Aware, and Active: Contextual Approaches as an Emerging Trend in the Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies[J] . Steven C. Hayes,Matthieu Villatte,Michael Levin,Mikaela Hildebrandt.Annual Review of Clinical Psychology . 2011
[7]  
Avoidance and cognitive fusion – Central components in pain related disability? Development and preliminary validation of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS)[J] . European Journal of Pain . 2007 (4)
[8]  
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes[J] . Steven C. Hayes,Jason B. Luoma,Frank W. Bond,Akihiko Masuda,Jason Lillis.Behaviour Research and Therapy . 2005 (1)
[9]  
Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies[J] . Steven C. Hayes.Behavior Therapy . 2004 (4)
[10]  
Experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, and an ACT approach to anorexia nervosa[J] . Steven C. Hayes,Julieann Pankey.Cognitive and Behavioral Practice . 2002 (3)