资源环境承载力评估新视角：行星边界框架的源起、发展与展望

被引：29

作者：

陈先鹏 ^{[1
]}

方恺 ^{[1
]}

彭建 ^{[2
]}

刘爱原 ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] 浙江大学公共管理学院

[2] 北京大学城市与环境学院地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室

[3] 集美大学图书馆

来源：

自然资源学报 | 2020年 / 35卷 / 03期

关键词：

承载力; 行星边界; 生物物理过程; 阈值; 尺度;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

X826 [生物评价、生态评价];

学科分类号：

1402 ;

摘要：

将人类活动规模与强度控制在自然生态系统可承载限度之内,是可持续发展理论的核心要义。行星边界框架所秉持的"地球系统观",为资源环境承载力评估提供了新视角,一经提出便在国际可持续发展领域引发极大关注与热烈讨论。本文系统阐述了行星边界框架的理论基础及其内涵演进,着重论述了该框架在国家、省域、市域和组织等不同尺度的发展与应用,深入探讨了其面临的挑战与改进方向,并与传统资源环境承载力研究范式进行了比较。研究表明:行星边界框架以复杂系统稳态和突变理论为基础,是历史经验与科学研究有机结合的产物。作为对现有资源环境承载力评估体系的有益补充,该框架由全球尺度向区域尺度拓展时,遵循自上而下分配与自下而上整合两条路径。当前行星边界框架中关于生物物理过程的尺度效应与交互机制的阐述较为薄弱,导致其变量选取与边界设置仍存较大争议,在与环境影响评价相整合、向社会经济维度拓展等方面面临方法学挑战。今后应从理论基础、技术方法、实践应用等方面继续深化研究,提升行星边界框架在可持续发展目标(SDGs)等全球重大公共议题中的政策价值。

引用

页码：513 / 531

页数：19

共 53 条

[31]

Understanding the complementary linkages between environmental footprints and planetary boundaries in a footprint–boundary environmental sustainability assessment framework[J] . Kai Fang,Reinout Heijungs,Geert R. De Snoo.Ecological Economics . 2015

[32]

Exploring the planetary boundary for chemical pollution[J] . Miriam L. Diamond,Cynthia A. de Wit,Sverker Molander,Martin Scheringer,Thomas Backhaus,Rainer Lohmann,Rickard Arvidsson,?ke Bergman,Michael Hauschild,Ivan Holoubek,Linn Persson,Noriyuki Suzuki,Marco Vighi,Cornelius Zetzsch.Environment International . 2015

[33]

Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems[J] . John A. Dearing,Rong Wang,Ke Zhang,James G. Dyke,Helmut Haberl,Md. Sarwar Hossain,Peter G. Langdon,Timothy M. Lenton,Kate Raworth,Sally Brown,Jacob Carstensen,Megan J. Cole,Sarah E. Cornell,Terence P. Dawson,C. Patrick Doncaster,Felix Eigenbrod,Martina Fl?rke,Elizabeth Jeffers,Anson W. Mackay,Bj?rn Nykvist,Guy M. Poppy.Global Environmental Change . 2014

[34]

Approaches to defining a planetary boundary for biodiversity[J] . Georgina M. Mace,Belinda Reyers,Rob Alkemade,Reinette Biggs,F. Stuart Chapin,Sarah E. Cornell,Sandra Díaz,Simon Jennings,Paul Leadley,Peter J. Mumby,Andy Purvis,Robert J. Scholes,Alistair W.R. Seddon,Martin Solan,Will Steffen,Guy Woodward.Global Environmental Change . 2014

[35]

Understanding the water-energy-carbon nexus in urban water utilities: Comparison of four city case studies and the relevant influencing factors[J] . G. Venkatesh,Arthur Chan,Helge Bratteb?.Energy . 2014

[36]

Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: Overview of a footprint family[J] . Kai Fang,Reinout Heijungs,Geert R. de Snoo.Ecological Indicators . 2014

[37]

Towards a revised planetary boundary for consumptive freshwater use: role of environmental flow requirements[J] . Dieter Gerten,Holger Hoff,Johan Rockstr?m,Jonas J?germeyr,Matti Kummu,Amandine V Pastor.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability . 2013 (6)

[38]

Planetary boundaries revisited: a view through the ‘water lens’[J] . Janos J Bogardi,Balázs M Fekete,Charles J V?r?smarty.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability . 2013 (6)

[39]

Chemical footprint: A methodological framework for bridging life cycle assessment and planetary boundaries for chemical pollution[J] . Sala, Serenella,Goralczyk, Malgorzata.Integrated Environmental Assessment and Managemen . 2013 (4)

[40]

Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts[J] . Wim de Vries,Johannes Kros,Carolien Kroeze,Sybil P Seitzinger.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability . 2013 (3-4)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →