人工颈椎间盘的假体结构及应用特点

被引：3

作者：

颜端国

机构：

[1] 监利县人民医院骨科

来源：

中国组织工程研究 | 2014年 / 18卷 / 26期

关键词：

颈椎病; 椎间盘; 假体和植入物; 植入物; 人工假体; 人工颈椎间盘; 假体; 椎间盘突出症; 外科治疗;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R318.17 [运动器官];

学科分类号：

100103 [病原生物学];

摘要：

背景:目前人工颈椎间盘假体设计和使用都得到了很大的发展,主要有低磨擦滑动面、弹簧系统、橡胶制成的人工颈椎间盘及其他各种弹性假体。目的:总结人工颈椎间盘假体结构特点及在骨科的应用现状。方法:由第一作者以"人工颈椎间盘;假体;椎间盘突出症"和"Artificial Cervical Disc;prosthesis;intervertebral disc herniation;the surgical therapy"为关键词,分别在CNKI(2000至2013年)和PubMed数据库(1960至2013年)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed)检索近年文献,检索内容为人工颈椎间盘假体在骨科的应用。计算机在CNKI数据库检索出200篇文献,在PubMed数据库检索出56篇文献,阅读标题和摘要进行筛选,保留符合纳入标准的40篇归纳总结。结果与结论:人工颈椎间盘假体类似椎间盘生理功能,材料具有耐磨损、耐疲劳、抗腐蚀等特点,它类似于人体椎间盘的生理和生物力学载荷功能,保持了脊柱的稳定和运动功能,避免了邻近节段的退变加速。文章重点对Bryan、Mobi-C、PCM、Prodisc-C、Prestige及CerviCore人工颈椎间盘结构做了介绍。人工颈椎间盘置换的短期疗效已得到认可,但是它不能完全替代颈前路植骨融合内固定,是治疗颈椎退变性椎间盘疾病的又一主要手段。

引用

页码：4260 / 4264

页数：5

共 21 条

[1]

Cervical artificial disc replacement with ProDisc-C: Clinical and radiographic outcomes with long-term follow-up [J].

Malham, Gregory M. ;

Parker, Rhiannon M. ;

Ellis, Ngaire J. ;

Chan, Philip G. ;

Varma, Dinesh .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (06) :949-953

[2]

The predisposing factors for the heterotopic ossification after cervical artificial disc replacement.[J].Seong Yi;Dong Ah Shin;Keung Nyun Kim;Gwihyun Choi;Hyun Chul Shin;Keun Su Kim;Do Heum Yoon.The Spine Journal.2013,

[3]

Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis [J].

Ryu, Won Hyung A. ;

Kowalczyk, Izabela ;

Duggal, Neil .

SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (06) :628-634

[4]

Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing long-term follow-up results from two FDA trials.[J].Praveen Mummaneni;Beejal Amin;Jau-Ching Wu;Erika Brodt;Joseph Dettori;Rick Sasso.Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal.2012, S 01

[5]

Total disc replacement in the cervical spine: a systematic review evaluating long-term safety.[J].Paul Anderson;Robin Hashimoto.Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal.2012, S 01

[6]

Three-dimensional assessment of the intervertebral kinematics after Mobi-C total disc replacement at the cervical spine in vivo using the EOS stereoradiography system.[J].Marc-Antoine Rousseau;Sébastien Laporte;Thierry Dufour;Jean-Paul Steib;Jean-Yves Lazennec;Wafa Skalli.SAS Journal.2011, 3

[7]

Comparison of Cervical Spine Biomechanics After Fixed- and Mobile-Core Artificial Disc Replacement: A Finite Element Analysis [J].

Lee, Sang-Hun ;

Im, Yang-Jin ;

Kim, Ki-Tack ;

Kim, Yoon-Hyuk ;

Park, Won-Man ;

Kim, Kyungsoo .

SPINE, 2011, 36 (09) :700-708

[8]

Eight-Year Clinical and Radiological Follow-Up of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty [J].

Quan, Gerald M. Y. ;

Vital, Jean-Marc ;

Hansen, Steve ;

Pointillart, Vincent .

SPINE, 2011, 36 (08) :639-646

[9]

Sagittal Cervical Alignment After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].

Anakwenze, Okechukwu A. ;

Auerbach, Joshua D. ;

Milby, Andrew H. ;

Lonner, Baron S. ;

Balderston, Richard A. .

SPINE, 2009, 34 (19) :2001-2007

[10]

P64. Patient Clinical Outcomes and Motion at 1 Year Follow-Up: Cervicore Disc Replacement vs. Fusion.[J].Jean-Jaques Abitbol;Neill Wright;Nevan Baldwin.The Spine Journal.2009, 10

← 1 2 3 →