现实建构主义与自由建构主义:一种研究纲领内部的分化

被引:15
作者
董青岭
机构
[1] 外交学院
关键词
现实建构主义; 自由建构主义; 现实主义; 自由主义;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D80 [外交、国际关系理论];
学科分类号
摘要
作为竞争性理论,现实建构主义与自由建构主义均强调国际政治的社会建构性,二者的分歧不在于认识论和本体论,而在于诸如身份如何被建构、规范如何被社会化、国际政治最终朝向何种方向演化以及谁是国际关系的关键施动者等一系列"有关国际政治如何运行"的规范性问题。围绕这些分歧,现实建构主义与自由建构主义分庭抗礼,其实质是坚持建构主义研究方法的两种不同政治哲学之对立,因而其学术分野应居于建构主义国际关系研究纲领内部。就此而言,现实建构主义的理论内核应是权力政治的社会建构,是国际关系的进化冲突论;与之相对应,自由建构主义的理论内核则是合作政治的社会建构,是国际关系的进化合作论。
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 53+4 +4-5
页数:12
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [51] “High Tension without War:Interpreting Taiwan StraitRelations from1990to2005,”. Yang Cai. http://etd.gsu.edu/theses/available/etd-11182005-221708/unrestricted/caiyang200512ma.pdf . 2005
  • [52] "Liberal-Idealism:A Constructivist Critique,". Brent J Steele. International Studies Review . 2007
  • [53] “Real-ism and Constructivism:From Debate to Dialogue,”. Alexander Wendt,Patrick T.Jackson,Daniel Nexon. Conference on Realistand Constructivist International Relations Theory at the Mershon Center forInternational Security Studies . 2005
  • [54] “Paradigmatic Faults:Whythe Divisions in International Relations Aren’t All They’re Cracked up toBe,”. Patrick T.Jackson,Daniel Nexon. the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association . 2004
  • [55] Bridging the Gap:Toward a Realist-Constructivist Dialogue,". International Studies Review . 2004
  • [56] "Integrating Institutions:Rationalism,Constructivism,and theStudy of the European Union,". Joseph Jupille,James Caporaso,Jeffery T.Checkel. Comparative Politics . 2003
  • [57] Theories ofInternational Cooperation and the PrimacyofAnarchy:ExplainingU.S.International MonetaryPol-icy-Making after Bretton Woods. Jennifer Sterling-Folker. . 2002
  • [58] "Realist Constructivism,". J.Samuel Barkin. International Stud-ies Review . 2003
  • [59] Panel on"Realist Constructivism,Constructivist Realism?". Amer-ican Political Science Association Annual Meeting . 1998
  • [60] "Power in Realist-Construc-tivism Research,". Janice B.Mattern. .