导师合著网络对博士生科研产出的影响

被引：15

作者：

袁康 ^{[1
]}

汤超颖 ^{[1
]}

李美智 ^{[1
]}

詹佳硕 ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院

[2] 环境保护部核与辐射安全中心

来源：

管理评论 | 2016年 / 28卷 / 09期

关键词：

合著网络; 博士生; 科研产出; 程度中心性; 中介中心性;

D O I：

10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2016.09.020

中图分类号：

G643 [研究生教育];

学科分类号：

040106 ;

摘要：

博士生是我国科研创新的重要力量,本文将从导师合著网络的角度探索提升博士生科研产出的对策。我们构建了139名理科博士生就学期间的导师合著网络,分析了博士生及其导师在导师合著网络中的特征,以及它们对博士生科研产出的影响。主要结论如下:博士生的合作规模与其科研产出呈倒U形关系;博士生在其导师合著网络中的程度中心性有助于其科研产出;导师网络的程度中心势调节博士生程度中心性与科研产出的关系,导师的中介中心性调节学生程度中心性和学生科研产出的关系。最后,我们就科研管理提出相关建议。

引用

页码：228 / 237

页数：10

共 34 条

[21]

Competitive Dynamics in Electronic Networks: A Model and the Case of Interorganizational Systems[J] . Lei Chi,ClydeW. Holsapple,Cidambi Srinivasan.International Journal of Electronic Commerce . 2007 (3)

[22]

Free Riding in Group Projects and the Effects of Timing, Frequency, and Specificity of Criteria in Peer Assessments[J] . Charles M. Brooks,Janice L. Ammons.Journal of Education for Business . 2003 (5)

[23]

A Quantitative Analysis of PhD Students’ Views of Supervision[J] . Trevor Heath.Higher Education Research ＆ Development . 2002 (1)

[24] Co-authorship and the output of academic economists [J].

Hollis, A .

LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2001, 8 (04) :503-530

[25] Double effort = Double impact?: A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry [J].

Glänzel, W ;

Schubert, A .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 50 (02) :199-214

[26]

Structural Analysis of Co-Author Relationships and Author Productivity in Selected Outlets for Consumer Behavior Research[J] . John P. Eaton,James C. Ward,Ajith Kumar,Peter H. Reingen.Journal of Consumer Psychology . 1999 (1)

[27]

Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage[J] . Janine Nahapiet,Sumantra Ghoshal.The Academy of Management Review . 1998 (2)

[28] How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model [J].

Katz, JS ;

Hicks, D .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 1997, 40 (03) :541-554

[29] What is research collaboration? [J].

Katz, JS ;

Martin, BR .

RESEARCH POLICY, 1997, 26 (01) :1-18

[30]

The Rising Incidence of Co-authorship in Economics: Further Evidence[J] . The Review of Economics and Statistics . 1988 (3)

← 1 2 3 4 →