Soil organic carbon concentrations and stocks on Barro Colorado Island -: Digital soil mapping using Random Forests analysis

被引:500
作者
Grimm, R. [1 ]
Behrens, T. [2 ]
Maerker, M. [1 ]
Elsenbeer, H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Inst Geoecol, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Inst Geog, D-72070 Tubingen, Germany
[3] Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Balboa, Panama
关键词
soil organic carbon; digital soil mapping; random forest; spatial pattern; tropical soils; Barro Colorado Island;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.05.008
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Spatial estimates of tropical soil organic carbon (SOC) concentrations and stocks are crucial to understanding the role of tropical SOC in the global carbon cycle. They also allow for spatial variation of SOC in environmental process models. SOC is spatially highly variable. In traditional approaches, SOC concentrations and stocks have been derived from estimates for single or very few profiles and spatially linked to existing units of soil or vegetation maps. However, many existing soil profile data are incomplete and untested as to whether they are representative or unbiased. Also single means for soil or vegetation map units cannot characterize SOC spatial variability within these units. We here use the digital soil mapping approach to predict the spatial distribution of SOC. This relies on a soil inference model based on spatially referenced environmental layers of topographic attributes, soil units, parent material, and forest history. We sampled soils at 165 sites, stratified according to topography and lithology, on Barro Colorado island (BCI), Panama, at depths of 0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, 20-30 cm, and 30-50 cm, and analyzed them for SOC by dry combustion. We applied Random Forest (RF) analysis as a modeling tool to the SOC data for each depth interval in order to compare vertical and lateral distribution patterns. RF has several advantages compared to other modeling approaches, for instance, the fact that it is neither sensitive to overfitting nor to noise features. The RF-based digital SOC mapping approach provided SOC estimates of high spatial resolution and estimates of error and predictor importance. The environmental variables that explained most of the variation in the topsoil (010 cm) were topographic attributes. In the subsoil (10-50 cm), SOC distribution was best explained by soil texture classes as derived from soil mapping units. The estimates for SOC stocks in the upper 30 cm ranged between 38 and 116 Mg ha(-1), with lowest stocks on midslope and highest on toeslope positions. This digital soil mapping approach can be applied to similar landscapes to refine the spatial resolution of SOC estimates. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 113
页数:12
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [61] *MIN COM IND, 1976, MAP GEOL PAN
  • [62] Prediction and digital mapping of soil carbon storage in the Lower Namoi Valley
    Minasny, B
    McBratney, AB
    Mendonça-Santos, ML
    Odeh, IOA
    Guyon, B
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2006, 44 (03): : 233 - 244
  • [63] SOIL ATTRIBUTE PREDICTION USING TERRAIN ANALYSIS
    MOORE, ID
    GESSLER, PE
    NIELSEN, GA
    PETERSON, GA
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1993, 57 (02) : 443 - 452
  • [64] DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELING - A REVIEW OF HYDROLOGICAL, GEOMORPHOLOGICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
    MOORE, ID
    GRAYSON, RB
    LADSON, AR
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1991, 5 (01) : 3 - 30
  • [65] NOGAMI M, 1995, Z GEOMORPHOLOGIE S, V101, P53
  • [66] FURTHER RESULTS ON PREDICTION OF SOIL PROPERTIES FROM TERRAIN ATTRIBUTES - HETEROTOPIC COKRIGING AND REGRESSION-KRIGING
    ODEH, IOA
    MCBRATNEY, AB
    CHITTLEBOROUGH, DJ
    [J]. GEODERMA, 1995, 67 (3-4) : 215 - 226
  • [67] Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification
    Pal, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 26 (01) : 217 - 222
  • [68] Indicator bacteria at five swimming beaches - analysis using random forests
    Parkhurst, DF
    Brenner, KP
    Dufour, AP
    Wymer, LJ
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (07) : 1354 - 1360
  • [69] Change in soil carbon following afforestation
    Paul, KI
    Polglase, PJ
    Nyakuengama, JG
    Khanna, PK
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 168 (1-3) : 241 - 257
  • [70] SOIL CARBON POOLS AND WORLD LIFE ZONES
    POST, WM
    EMANUEL, WR
    ZINKE, PJ
    STANGENBERGER, AG
    [J]. NATURE, 1982, 298 (5870) : 156 - 159