Transcatheter arterial chemotherapy with and without embolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:68
作者
Ikeda, M [1 ]
Maeda, S [1 ]
Shibata, J [1 ]
Muta, R [1 ]
Ashihara, H [1 ]
Tanaka, M [1 ]
Fujiyama, S [1 ]
Tomita, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 3, Kumamoto 860, Japan
关键词
hepatocellular carcinoma; transcatheter arterial chemoembolization transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy cisplatin;
D O I
10.1159/000076331
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: This study compared the antitumor effect, adverse effects and survival between transcatheter arterial embolization ( TAE) and transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy ( TAI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma ( HCC). Methods: The study population consisted of 168 consecutive patients with advanced HCC treated with transcatheter arterial treatments using cisplatin suspended in lipiodol. Among these, 74 patients were treated with TAE, and the remaining 94 patients were treated with TAI. Results: There were no significant differences in any baseline characteristics except hemoglobin, platelets, albumin, and glutamic pyruvic transaminase. Complete or partial tumor response was achieved in 54 patients ( 73%) in the TAE group and in 48 patients ( 51%) in the TAI group ( p < 0.01). There were two treatment- related deaths caused by acute hepatic failure and acute renal failure in the TAE group. Nausea and deterioration of serum transaminase after TAE were significantly more severe than after TAI. Median survival time and survival rates at 5 years were 3.1 years and 25% in the TAE group, and 2.5 years and 18% in the TAI group (p = 0.37). Conclusion: TAE has a higher antitumor effect than TAI, but does not significantly improve the survival of patients with HCC. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 31
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]  
Maeda S, 2003, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V50, P809
[12]   Survival and local recurrence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated by transarterial chemolipiodolization with and without embolization [J].
Maeda, S ;
Fujiyama, S ;
Tanaka, M ;
Ashihara, H ;
Hirata, R ;
Tomita, K .
HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2002, 23 (03) :202-210
[13]  
Manghisi G, 1998, HEPATOLOGY, V28, P751
[14]  
MANTEL NATHAN, 1966, CANCERCHEMOTHERAP REP, V50, P163
[15]  
NAKAKUMA K, 1983, CANCER, V52, P2193, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19831215)52:12<2193::AID-CNCR2820521203>3.0.CO
[16]  
2-R
[17]   Transcatheter arterial embolization for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The controversy continues [J].
Okada, S .
HEPATOLOGY, 1998, 27 (06) :1743-1744
[18]  
OKUDA K, 1985, CANCER, V56, P918, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850815)56:4<918::AID-CNCR2820560437>3.0.CO
[19]  
2-E
[20]   Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Okusaka, T ;
Okada, S ;
Ueno, H ;
Ikeda, M ;
Yoshimori, M ;
Shimada, K ;
Yamamoto, J ;
Kosuge, T ;
Yamasaki, S ;
Iwata, R ;
Furukawa, H ;
Moriyama, N ;
Sakamoto, M ;
Hirohashi, S .
ONCOLOGY, 2000, 58 (04) :293-299