Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research

被引:493
作者
Kellens, Wim [1 ]
Terpstra, Teun [2 ]
De Maeyer, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Geog, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] HKV Consultants Lijn Water, NL-8203 AC Lelystad, Netherlands
基金
比利时弗兰德研究基金会;
关键词
Flood risk; literature review; risk communication; risk perception; PUBLIC PERCEPTION; NATURAL HAZARDS; SOCIAL PERCEPTIONS; MITIGATION; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; REGION; PREPAREDNESS; HOUSEHOLDS; VICTIMS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Flood hazards are the most common and destructive of all natural disasters. For decades, experts have been examining how flood losses can be mitigated. Just as in other risk domains, the study of risk perception and risk communication has gained increasing interest in flood risk management. Because of this research growth, a review of the state of the art in this domain is believed necessary. The review comprises 57 empirically based peer-reviewed articles on flood risk perception and communication from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The characteristics of these articles are listed in a comprehensive table, presenting research design, research variables, and key findings. From this review, it follows that the majority of studies are of exploratory nature and have not applied any of the theoretical frameworks that are available in social science research. Consequently, a methodological standardization in measuring and analyzing people's flood risk perceptions and their adaptive behaviors is hardly present. This heterogeneity leads to difficulties in comparing results among studies. It is also shown that theoretical and empirical studies on flood risk communication are nearly nonexistent. The article concludes with a summary on methodological issues in the fields of flood-risk perception and flood-risk communication and proposes an agenda for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 49
页数:26
相关论文
共 100 条
[21]   'It'll never happen to me': understanding public awareness of local flood risk [J].
Burningham, Kate ;
Fielding, Jane ;
Thrush, Diana .
DISASTERS, 2008, 32 (02) :216-238
[22]  
Correia FN, 1998, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V12, P209
[23]  
Covello V., 1986, RISK ABSTRACTS, V5, P172
[24]  
DEVILLIERS GD, 1994, WATER SA, V20, P9
[25]   Coping with risk: analysis on the importance of integrating social perceptions on flood risk into management mechanisms - the case of the municipality of Agueda, Portugal [J].
Figueiredo, Elisabete ;
Valente, Sandra ;
Coelho, Celeste ;
Pinho, Luisa .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2009, 12 (05) :581-602
[26]   HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH - PSYCHOMETRIC STUDY OF ATTITUDES TOWARDS TECHNOLOGICAL RISKS AND BENEFITS [J].
FISCHHOFF, B ;
SLOVIC, P ;
LICHTENSTEIN, S ;
READ, S ;
COMBS, B .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1978, 9 (02) :127-152
[27]   RISK PERCEPTION AND COMMUNICATION UNPLUGGED - 20 YEARS OF PROCESS [J].
FISCHHOFF, B .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1995, 15 (02) :137-145
[28]   Risk perception and hazard mitigation in the Yangtze River Delta region, China [J].
Ge, Yi ;
Xu, Wei ;
Gu, Zhi-Hui ;
Zhang, Yu-Chao ;
Chen, Lei .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2011, 56 (03) :633-648
[29]   Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors [J].
Griffin, RJ ;
Dunwoody, S ;
Neuwirth, K .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 80 (02) :S230-S245
[30]   Information sufficiency and risk communication [J].
Griffin, RJ ;
Neuwirth, K ;
Dunwoody, S ;
Giese, J .
MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 6 (01) :23-61