Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services

被引:147
作者
Burkhard, Benjamin [1 ]
de Groot, Rudolf [2 ]
Costanza, Robert [3 ]
Seppelt, Ralf [4 ]
Jorgensen, Sven Erik [5 ]
Potschin, Marion [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Inst Nat Resource Conservat, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Environm Syst Anal Grp, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Portland State Univ, Inst Sustainable Solut, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Pharm, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Nottingham, Sch Geog, Ctr Environm Management, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
Earth; (planet); -; Biodiversity; Ecosystems;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The evaluation of environmental, social and economic tradeoffs requires a combined view of how the various ecosystem or landscape function approaches are linked. An emerging need for scientific development, as well as fostering of applications and environmental management based on of the ecosystem service concept has been identified. The human population of earth is likely to increase to 9 billion people by the end of the century, the global climate is being transformed, biodiversity loss continues, and conventional, fossil-based economies are no longer a viable option. Accounting looks at the flow of processes or materials and is relatively objective, while assessment evaluates a system or process with a goal in mind and is more normative. Both are integrating frameworks that have distinctive roles. Both ecosystem service accounting and assessment need to be established and pursued in a broader socio-ecological context.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Ecosystem properties, potentials and services - The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example [J].
Bastian, Olaf ;
Haase, Dagmar ;
Grunewald, Karsten .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :7-16
[2]   Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets [J].
Burkhard, Benjamin ;
Kroll, Franziska ;
Nedkov, Stoyan ;
Mueller, Felix .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :17-29
[3]   Ecosystem services - Bridging ecology, economy and social sciences [J].
Burkhard, Benjamin ;
Petrosillo, Irene ;
Costanza, Robert .
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) :257-259
[4]   Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services [J].
Busch, Malte ;
La Notte, Alessandra ;
Laporte, Valerie ;
Erhard, Markus .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :89-103
[5]   Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed [J].
Costanza, Robert .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (02) :350-352
[6]   Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver [J].
Daily, Gretchen C. ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Goldstein, Joshua ;
Kareiva, Peter M. ;
Mooney, Harold A. ;
Pejchar, Liba ;
Ricketts, Taylor H. ;
Salzman, James ;
Shallenberger, Robert .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (01) :21-28
[7]   A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics [J].
Frank, Susanne ;
Fuerst, Christine ;
Koschke, Lars ;
Makeschin, Franz .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :30-38
[8]   Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs [J].
Haines-Young, Roy ;
Potschin, Marion ;
Kienast, Felix .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :39-53
[9]   Tool boxes for an integrated ecological and environmental management [J].
Jorgensen, Sven Erik ;
Nielsen, Soren Nors .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :104-109
[10]   A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning [J].
Koschke, Lars ;
Fuerst, Christine ;
Frank, Susanne ;
Makeschin, Franz .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :54-66