The relative importance of project success dimensions

被引:88
作者
Lipovetsky, S [1 ]
Tishler, A [1 ]
Dvir, D [1 ]
Shenhar, A [1 ]
机构
[1] STEVENS INST TECHNOL,HOBOKEN,NJ 07030
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9310.00047
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Traditionally, the success of a project is assessed using internal measures such as technical and operational goals, and meeting schedule and budget, More recently, it has been recognized that several other measures should be used to define project success, These measures reflect external effectiveness: the project's impact on its customers, and on the developing organization itself, In our study of 110 defense projects performed by Israeli industry, we used a multidimensional approach to measure the success of defense projects, Based on previous studies, we defined four dimensions of success: meeting design goals; benefits to the customer; benefits to the developing organization; and benefits to the defense and national infrastructure, For each project, we asked three different stakeholders (the customer, the developing organization, and the coordinating office within the Ministry of Defense) for their views on the relative importance of these dimensions of success, Analysis of the data revealed that the dimension benefits to the customer is by far the most important success dimension, The second in importance is meeting design goals, The other two dimensions are relatively unimportant.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 106
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
[2]  
Baker B. N., 1983, Project Management Handbook
[3]   CONSISTENT WEIGHTS FOR JUDGMENTS MATRICES OF THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF ALTERNATIVES [J].
BARZILAI, J ;
COOK, WD ;
GOLANY, B .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 1987, 6 (03) :131-134
[4]   SUCCESS FACTORS IN PRODUCT INNOVATION [J].
COOPER, RG ;
KLEINSCHMIDT, EJ .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 1987, 16 (03) :215-223
[5]  
DANIELS HE, 1969, BIOMETRIKA, V56, P295
[6]  
David H.A., 1969, METHOD PAIRED COMP
[7]   RANKING PLAYERS IN A ROUND ROBIN TOURNAMENT [J].
DAVID, HA .
REVUE DE L INSTITUT INTERNATIONAL DE STATISTIQUE-REVIEW OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL INSTITUTE, 1971, 39 (02) :137-&
[8]  
DECOTIIS TA, 1979, RES MANAGE, V16, P17
[9]   ROUND ROBIN [J].
DEGRAY, RJ .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1968, 10 (04) :841-&
[10]  
DVIR D, 1992, ENG MANAGEMENT J, V4, P33, DOI DOI 10.1080/10429247.1992.11414701