Key multiplicity issues in clinical drug development

被引:77
作者
Dmitrienko, Alex [1 ]
D'Agostino, Ralph B., Sr. [2 ]
Huque, Mohammad F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Quintiles Inc, Durham, NC 27703 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] US FDA, Off Biostat, OTS, CDER, Silver Spring, MD USA
关键词
clinical trials; multiple comparisons; type I error rate control; mltiple testing procedures; gatekeeping procedures; SIMULTANEOUS CONFIDENCE-REGIONS; CLOSED TESTING PROCEDURES; POINT ADJUSTMENT METHODS; END-POINT; BONFERRONI PROCEDURE; TRIALS; STRATEGIES; HOCHBERG; PLACEBO; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/sim.5642
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
090105 [作物生产系统与生态工程];
摘要
Much progress has been made over the past decade with the development of novel methods for addressing increasingly more complex multiplicity problems arising in confirmatory Phase III clinical trials. This includes traditional problems with a single source of multiplicity, for example, analysis of multiple endpoints or doseplacebo contrasts. In addition, more advanced problems with several sources of multiplicity have attracted attention in clinical drug development. These problems include two or more families of objectives such as multiple endpoints evaluated at multiple dose levels or in multiple patient populations. This paper provides a review of concepts that play a central role in defining and solving multiplicity problems (error rate definitions) and introduces main classes of multiple testing procedures widely used in clinical trials (nonparametric, semiparametric, and parametric procedures). The paper also presents recent advances in multiplicity research, including gatekeeping procedures for clinical trials with multiple sets of objectives. The concepts and methods introduced in the paper are illustrated using several case studies on the basis of real clinical trials. Software implementation of commonly used multiple testing and gatekeeping procedures is discussed. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1111
页数:33
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]
A consistency-adjusted alpha-adaptive strategy for sequential testing [J].
Alosh, Mohamed ;
Huque, Mohammad F. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (15) :1559-1571
[2]
A flexible strategy for testing subgroups and overall population [J].
Alosh, Mohamed ;
Huque, Mohammad F. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (01) :3-23
[3]
[Anonymous], DRUG INF J
[4]
[Anonymous], 1993, Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-Value Adjustment
[5]
[Anonymous], 1987, Multiple comparison procedures
[6]
Bauer P, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2133, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980930)17:18<2133::AID-SIM901>3.0.CO
[7]
2-2
[8]
A Mixture Gatekeeping Procedure Based on the Hommel Test for Clinical Trial Applications [J].
Brechenmacher, Thomas ;
Xu, Jane ;
Dmitrienko, Alex ;
Tamhane, Ajit C. .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2011, 21 (04) :748-767
[9]
A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures [J].
Bretz, Frank ;
Maurer, W. ;
Brannath, Werner ;
Posch, Martin .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (04) :586-604
[10]
A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni-based multiple tests [J].
Burman, C. -F. ;
Sonesson, C. ;
Guilbaud, O. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (05) :739-761