Ultrasound measurements at the calcaneus in men: Differences between healthy and fractured persons and the influence of age and anthropometric features on ultrasound parameters

被引:25
作者
Pluskiewicz, W
Drozdzowska, B
机构
[1] Silesian Acad Med, Dept & Clin Internal & Allerg Dis, PL-41800 Zabrze, Poland
[2] Silesian Acad Med, Dept & Chair Pathomorphol, PL-41800 Zabrze, Poland
关键词
age; body size; fracture discrimination; male; osteoporotic fracture; quantitative ultrasound;
D O I
10.1007/s001980050193
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the ability of quantitative ultrasound at the calcaneus to discriminate between fractured and unfractured men, fracture probability, and the relationship of ultrasonic parameters to age and body size. The study included 224 men (age range 36-86 years) with no history of diseases or therapy affecting bone metabolism. The subjects were divided into two groups (unfractured, n = 148; fractured, n = 76) matched for age and body size. Bone status was assessed by ultrasound measurements at the calcaneus. Long-term in vitro CV% values were 0.88% for speed of sound (SOS) and 0.54% for broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA). In vivo CV% values were 0.33% for SOS and 2.48% for BUA, while sCV% values were 4.66% and 6.58%, respectively. The following SOS/BUA values were obtained: in unfractured men, SOS = 1517.5 +/- 35.3 m/s and BUA = 114.0 +/- 13.3 dB/MHz; in fractured men, SOS = 1492.6 +/- 24.6 m/s and BUA = 106.1 +/- 11.6 dB/MHz. The differences were significant (p < 0.0001). The odds ratio for BUA for all fractures was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.03-2.07) and for SOS 2.13 (95% CI, 0.77-3.49). Only the age-related decrease in SOS in unfractured men was significant (r = -0.17, p < 0.05). In fractured men, weight and body mass index (BMI) were found to correlate significantly with BUA (r = 0.31,p = 0.007, r = 0.31, p = 0.007, respectively). The areas under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were 0.706 for the calcaneus thus enable discrimination between fractured and healthy males. Different patterns of the relationship between age and body size in the two groups suggest the presence of other, unknown factors affecting bone status. Their identification requires further prospective studies.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 51
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF BONE IN NORMAL ITALIAN MALES AND FEMALES [J].
CEPOLLARO, C ;
AGNUSDEI, D ;
GONNELLI, S ;
MARTINI, G ;
PONDRELLI, C ;
BORRACELLI, D ;
PALMIERI, R ;
PARISI, G ;
GENNARI, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 68 (812) :910-914
[2]   Osteoporosis: Association of recent fractures with quantitative US findings [J].
Gluer, CC ;
Cummings, SR ;
Bauer, DC ;
Stone, K ;
Pressman, A ;
Mathur, A ;
Genant, HK .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (03) :725-732
[3]   The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: A review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk [J].
Gregg, EW ;
Kriska, AM ;
Salamone, LM ;
Roberts, MM ;
Anderson, SJ ;
Ferrell, RE ;
Kuller, LH ;
Cauley, JA .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 7 (02) :89-99
[4]   Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: The EPIDOS prospective study [J].
Hans, D ;
DargentMolina, P ;
Schott, AM ;
Sebert, JL ;
Cormier, C ;
Kotzki, PO ;
Delmas, PD ;
Pouilles, JM ;
Breart, G ;
Meunier, PJ .
LANCET, 1996, 348 (9026) :511-514
[5]  
Jackson Jeffrey A., 1993, P255
[6]  
Kleerekoper Michael, 1993, P223
[7]   Male and female normative data for ultrasound measurement of the calcaneus within the UK adult population [J].
Langton, CM ;
Langton, DK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (834) :580-585
[8]  
MASSIE A, 1991, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V49, P107
[9]   QUANTITATIVE ULTRASOUND BONE MEASUREMENTS - NORMAL VALUES AND COMPARISON WITH BONE-MINERAL DENSITY BY DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY [J].
MORIS, M ;
PERETZ, A ;
TJEKA, R ;
NEGABAN, N ;
WOUTERS, M ;
BERGMANN, P .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 57 (01) :6-10
[10]   The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: A review [J].
Njeh, CF ;
Boivin, CM ;
Langton, CM .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 7 (01) :7-22