Detecting selection bias in randomized clinical trials

被引:119
作者
Berger, VW [1 ]
Exner, DV [1 ]
机构
[1] NHLBI, Clin Trials Res Grp, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
来源
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS | 1999年 / 20卷 / 04期
关键词
allocation concealment; blocking; treatment allocation;
D O I
10.1016/S0197-2456(99)00014-8
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Lack of concealment of allocation in randomized clinical trials can invite selection bias, which is the preferential enrollment of specific patients into one treatment group over another. For example, patients more likely to respond may be enrolled only when the next treatment to be assigned is known to be the active treatment, and patients less likely to respond may be enrolled only when the next treatment to be assigned is known to be the control. Despite the fact that selection bias can compromise both the internal and external validity of trials, little methodology has been developed for its detection. An investigator may test the success of the randomization by comparing baseline characteristics across treatment groups, but such test is limited by the potential inability of the measured baseline variables to predict response. A new method for detecting selections bias, based on response data only, is developed for the case in which a small block size, and either unmasking of treatment codes or an open-label design, have compromised the concealment of allocation. This new method complements baseline comparisons, and is sensitive to detect selection bias even in situations in which baseline comparisons are not. Control Clin Trials 1999;20:319-327 (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 1999.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 327
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? [J].
Moher, D ;
Pham, B ;
Jones, A ;
Cook, DJ ;
Jadad, AR ;
Moher, M ;
Tugwell, P ;
Klassen, TP .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9128) :609-613
[12]  
MOSES LE, 1995, MED CARE, V33, pAS8
[13]  
NICKLAS JM, 1992, NEW ENGL J MED, V327, P685
[14]   ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED AND NONRANDOMIZED PATIENTS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS USING THE COMPREHENSIVE COHORT FOLLOW-UP-STUDY DESIGN [J].
OLSCHEWSKI, M ;
SCHUMACHER, M ;
DAVIS, KB .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1992, 13 (03) :226-239
[15]  
PROSCHAN M, 1994, STAT SINICA, V4, P219
[16]  
SCHULZ KF, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V274, P1456
[17]   EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE OF BIAS - DIMENSIONS OF METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY ASSOCIATED WITH ESTIMATES OF TREATMENT EFFECTS IN CONTROLLED TRIALS [J].
SCHULZ, KF ;
CHALMERS, I ;
HAYES, RJ ;
ALTMAN, DG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (05) :408-412
[18]  
SCHULZ KF, 1995, CAN MED ASSOC J, V153, P783
[19]   TESTING FOR BASE-LINE BALANCE IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
SENN, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (17) :1715-1726
[20]  
SENN S, 1997, STAT ISSUES DRUG DEV, P36